OBJECTIVE: To capture the neuropsychological profile among male carriers of the FMR1 premutation allele (55-200 CGG repeats) who do not meet diagnostic criteria for the late-onset fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, FXTAS. METHOD: We have initiated a multicenter collaboration that includes 3 independent cohorts, totaling 100 carriers of the premutation and 216 noncarriers. The initial focus of this collaboration has been on executive function. Four executive function scores are shared among the 3 cohorts (Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Stroop Color-Word Test, and Wechsler backward digit span and letter-number sequencing) whereas additional executive function scores are available for specific cohorts (Behavior Dyscontrol Scale, Hayling Sentence Completion Test Part B, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Raw scores were analyzed by using statistical models that adjust for cohort-specific effects as well as age and education. RESULTS: Carriers scored significantly lower compared to noncarriers on the Stroop Color-Word Test (p = .01), Hayling Sentence Completion Test Part B (p < .01), and Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale (p = .03), with the Hayling displaying a significant age-related decline (p = .01), as assessed by an age and repeat length-group interaction. Follow-up analysis of the collective data did not identify any specific age groups or repeat length ranges (i.e., low premutation = 55-70 repeats, midpremutation = 71-100 repeats, high premutation = 101-199 repeats) that were associated with an increased risk of executive function deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary analyses do not indicate global executive function impairment among male carriers without FXTAS compared to noncarriers. However, impairment in inhibitory capacity may be present among a subset of carriers, though the risk factors for this group do not appear to be related to age or repeat length.
OBJECTIVE: To capture the neuropsychological profile among male carriers of the FMR1 premutation allele (55-200 CGG repeats) who do not meet diagnostic criteria for the late-onset fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, FXTAS. METHOD: We have initiated a multicenter collaboration that includes 3 independent cohorts, totaling 100 carriers of the premutation and 216 noncarriers. The initial focus of this collaboration has been on executive function. Four executive function scores are shared among the 3 cohorts (Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Stroop Color-Word Test, and Wechsler backward digit span and letter-number sequencing) whereas additional executive function scores are available for specific cohorts (Behavior Dyscontrol Scale, Hayling Sentence Completion Test Part B, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Raw scores were analyzed by using statistical models that adjust for cohort-specific effects as well as age and education. RESULTS: Carriers scored significantly lower compared to noncarriers on the Stroop Color-Word Test (p = .01), Hayling Sentence Completion Test Part B (p < .01), and Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale (p = .03), with the Hayling displaying a significant age-related decline (p = .01), as assessed by an age and repeat length-group interaction. Follow-up analysis of the collective data did not identify any specific age groups or repeat length ranges (i.e., low premutation = 55-70 repeats, midpremutation = 71-100 repeats, high premutation = 101-199 repeats) that were associated with an increased risk of executive function deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary analyses do not indicate global executive function impairment among male carriers without FXTAS compared to noncarriers. However, impairment in inhibitory capacity may be present among a subset of carriers, though the risk factors for this group do not appear to be related to age or repeat length.
Authors: H Toledano-Alhadef; L Basel-Vanagaite; N Magal; B Davidov; S Ehrlich; V Drasinover; E Taub; G J Halpern; N Ginott; M Shohat Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-07-06 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Sarah M Coffey; Kylee Cook; Nicole Tartaglia; Flora Tassone; Danh V Nguyen; Ruiqin Pan; Hannah E Bronsky; Jennifer Yuhas; Mariya Borodyanskaya; Jim Grigsby; Melanie Doerflinger; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Jim Grigsby; Angela G Brega; Karen Engle; Maureen A Leehey; Randi J Hagerman; Flora Tassone; David Hessl; Paul J Hagerman; Jennifer B Cogswell; Rachael E Bennett; Kylee Cook; Deborah A Hall; Lanee S Bounds; Marsha J Paulich; Ann Reynolds Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Amy Cronister; Jennifer Teicher; Elizabeth M Rohlfs; Alan Donnenfeld; Stephanie Hallam Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: A Schneider; C Johnston; F Tassone; S Sansone; R J Hagerman; E Ferrer; S M Rivera; D Hessl Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Christopher M Filley; Mark S Brown; Karen Onderko; Megan Ray; Rachael E Bennett; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Jim Grigsby Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jin-Chen Yang; Christa Simon; Yu-Qiong Niu; Mark Bogost; Andrea Schneider; Flora Tassone; Andreea Seritan; Jim Grigsby; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman; John M Olichney Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 10.422