Literature DB >> 22246865

Profiling protease activities by dynamic proteomics workflows.

Diana Klingler1, Markus Hardt.   

Abstract

Proteases play prominent roles in many physiological processes and the pathogenesis of various diseases, which makes them interesting drug targets. To fully understand the functional role of proteases in these processes, it is necessary to characterize the target specificity of the enzymes, identify endogenous substrates and cleavage products as well as protease activators and inhibitors. The complexity of these proteolytic networks presents a considerable analytic challenge. To comprehensively characterize these systems, quantitative methods that capture the spatial and temporal distributions of the network members are needed. Recently, activity-based workflows have come to the forefront to tackle the dynamic aspects of proteolytic processing networks in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In this review, we will discuss how mass spectrometry-based approaches can be used to gain new insights into protease biology by determining substrate specificities, profiling the activity-states of proteases, monitoring proteolysis in vivo, measuring reaction kinetics and defining in vitro and in vivo proteolytic events. In addition, examples of future aspects of protease research that go beyond mass spectrometry-based applications are given.
Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246865      PMCID: PMC3431026          DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  91 in total

1.  Differential exoprotease activities confer tumor-specific serum peptidome patterns.

Authors:  Josep Villanueva; David R Shaffer; John Philip; Carlos A Chaparro; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Adam B Olshen; Martin Fleisher; Hans Lilja; Edi Brogi; Jeff Boyd; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Eric C Holland; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Howard I Scher; Paul Tempst
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Protease specificity determination by using cellular libraries of peptide substrates (CLiPS).

Authors:  Kevin T Boulware; Patrick S Daugherty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Proteomic discovery of protease substrates.

Authors:  Oliver Schilling; Christopher M Overall
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Methods for mapping protease specificity.

Authors:  Scott L Diamond
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Peptidomics: identification and quantification of endogenous peptides in neuroendocrine tissues.

Authors:  Lloyd D Fricker; Jihyeon Lim; Hui Pan; Fa-Yun Che
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

6.  Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joshua E Elias; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Proteomics discovery of metalloproteinase substrates in the cellular context by iTRAQ labeling reveals a diverse MMP-2 substrate degradome.

Authors:  Richard A Dean; Christopher M Overall
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Identification of proteolytic cleavage sites by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Mari Enoksson; Jingwei Li; Melanie M Ivancic; John C Timmer; Eric Wildfang; Alexey Eroshkin; Guy S Salvesen; W Andy Tao
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Positional proteomics: preparation of amino-terminal peptides as a strategy for proteome simplification and characterization.

Authors:  Lucy McDonald; Robert J Beynon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Profiling constitutive proteolytic events in vivo.

Authors:  John C Timmer; Mari Enoksson; Eric Wildfang; Wenhong Zhu; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Jean-Benard Denault; Yuliang Ma; Benjamin Dummitt; Yie-Hwa Chang; Alan E Mast; Alexey Eroshkin; Jeffrey W Smith; W Andy Tao; Guy S Salvesen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring proteolytic processing events by quantitative mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mariel Coradin; Kelly R Karch; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Global analysis of cellular proteolysis by selective enzymatic labeling of protein N-termini.

Authors:  Arun P Wiita; Julia E Seaman; James A Wells
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Software-aided approach to investigate peptide structure and metabolic susceptibility of amide bonds in peptide drugs based on high resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tatiana Radchenko; Andreas Brink; Yves Siegrist; Christopher Kochansky; Alison Bateman; Fabien Fontaine; Luca Morettoni; Ismael Zamora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A SILAC-based approach identifies substrates of caspase-dependent cleavage upon TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Gabriele Stoehr; Christoph Schaab; Johannes Graumann; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  The Proteasix Ontology.

Authors:  Mercedes Arguello Casteleiro; Julie Klein; Robert Stevens
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 6.  The quest for substrates and binding partners: A critical barrier for understanding the role of ADAMTS proteases in musculoskeletal development and disease.

Authors:  Brandon Satz-Jacobowitz; Dirk Hubmacher
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.780

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.