Literature DB >> 17157549

Methods for mapping protease specificity.

Scott L Diamond1.   

Abstract

The study of protease specificity provides information on active-site structure and function, protein-protein interaction, regulation of intracellular and extracellular pathways, and evolution of protease and substrate genes. Peptide libraries that include fluorogenic and binding tags are often generated by solid-phase synthesis. Even larger explorations of cleavage site preferences employ positional scanning libraries or phage display. Microarrays enable presentation of individual peptides to proteases, DNA sequences for capture of peptide nucleic acid encoded peptides, or nanodroplets containing soluble peptide sequences. These new methods continue to inform the design of chemical inhibitors and the identification of substrates of proteases.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157549     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  35 in total

1.  Finding the needles in the haystack: mapping constitutive proteolytic events in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew Bogyo
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Substrate specificity of human kallikreins 1 and 6 determined by phage display.

Authors:  Hai-Xin Li; Bum-Yeol Hwang; Gurunathan Laxmikanthan; Sachiko I Blaber; Michael Blaber; Pavel A Golubkov; Pengyu Ren; Brent L Iverson; George Georgiou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Using specificity to strategically target proteases.

Authors:  Mark D Lim; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Yanan Wang; Chen Li; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; André Leier; Neil D Rawlings; Gholamreza Haffari; Jerico Revote; Tatsuya Akutsu; Kuo-Chen Chou; Anthony W Purcell; Robert N Pike; Geoffrey I Webb; A Ian Smith; Trevor Lithgow; Roger J Daly; James C Whisstock; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  Profiling protease activities by dynamic proteomics workflows.

Authors:  Diana Klingler; Markus Hardt
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Global substrate specificity profiling of post-translational modifying enzymes.

Authors:  Sam L Ivry; Nicole O Meyer; Michael B Winter; Markus F Bohn; Giselle M Knudsen; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Proteome-derived peptide libraries to study the substrate specificity profiles of carboxypeptidases.

Authors:  Sebastian Tanco; Julia Lorenzo; Javier Garcia-Pardo; Sven Degroeve; Lennart Martens; Francesc Xavier Aviles; Kris Gevaert; Petra Van Damme
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Structural determinants of limited proteolysis.

Authors:  Marat D Kazanov; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Alexey M Eroshkin; Piotr Cieplak; Boris Ratnikov; Ying Zhang; Zhanwen Li; Adam Godzik; Andrei L Osterman; Jeffrey W Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  HTS by NMR of combinatorial libraries: a fragment-based approach to ligand discovery.

Authors:  Bainan Wu; Ziming Zhang; Roberta Noberini; Elisa Barile; Marc Giulianotti; Clemencia Pinilla; Richard A Houghten; Elena B Pasquale; Maurizio Pellecchia
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2013-01-24

10.  High throughput substrate phage display for protease profiling.

Authors:  Boris Ratnikov; Piotr Cieplak; Jeffrey W Smith
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.