PURPOSE: Chondromalacia patella is a distinct clinical entity of abnormal softening of the articular cartilage of the patella, which results in chronic retropatellar pain. Its aetiology is still unclear but the process is thought to be a due to trauma to superficial chondrocytes resulting in a proteolytic enzymic breakdown of the matrix. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation on patients with a proven symptomatic retropatellar lesion who had at least one failed conventional marrow-stimulating therapy. METHODS: We performed chondrocyte implantation on 48 patients: 25 received autologous chondrocyte implantation with a type I/III membrane (ACI-C) method (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland), and 23 received the Matrix-assisted Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) technique (Genzyme, Kastrup, Denmark). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in subjective pain scoring using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and objective functional scores using the Modified Cincinnati Rating System (MCS) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chondromalacia patellae lesions responded well to chondrocyte implantation. Better results occurred with MACI than with ACI-C. Excellent and good results were achieved in 40% of ACI-C patients and 57% of MACI patients, but success of chondrocyte implantation was greater with medial/odd-facet lesions. Given that the MACI procedure is technically easier and less time consuming, we consider it to be useful for treating patients with symptomatic chondral defects secondary to chondromalacia patellae.
PURPOSE:Chondromalacia patella is a distinct clinical entity of abnormal softening of the articular cartilage of the patella, which results in chronic retropatellar pain. Its aetiology is still unclear but the process is thought to be a due to trauma to superficial chondrocytes resulting in a proteolytic enzymic breakdown of the matrix. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation on patients with a proven symptomatic retropatellar lesion who had at least one failed conventional marrow-stimulating therapy. METHODS: We performed chondrocyte implantation on 48 patients: 25 received autologous chondrocyte implantation with a type I/III membrane (ACI-C) method (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland), and 23 received the Matrix-assisted Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) technique (Genzyme, Kastrup, Denmark). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in subjective pain scoring using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and objective functional scores using the Modified Cincinnati Rating System (MCS) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:Chondromalacia patellae lesions responded well to chondrocyte implantation. Better results occurred with MACI than with ACI-C. Excellent and good results were achieved in 40% of ACI-Cpatients and 57% of MACI patients, but success of chondrocyte implantation was greater with medial/odd-facet lesions. Given that the MACI procedure is technically easier and less time consuming, we consider it to be useful for treating patients with symptomatic chondral defects secondary to chondromalacia patellae.
Authors: Daniel Meyerkort; Jay R Ebert; Timothy R Ackland; William B Robertson; Michael Fallon; M H Zheng; David J Wood Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Christian Albrecht; Brigitte Tichy; Sylvia Nürnberger; Lukas Zak; Markus Johannes Handl; Stefan Marlovits; Silke Aldrian Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Philipp Niemeyer; Gian Salzmann; Matthias Feucht; Jan Pestka; Stella Porichis; Peter Ogon; Norbert Südkamp; Hagen Schmal Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Charles A Su; Nikunj N Trivedi; Hao-Tinh Le; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; Travis G Maak; Michael J Salata; James E Voos; Michael Karns Journal: Sports Health Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 3.843