Literature DB >> 22245963

Erosive reflux disease increases risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma, compared with nonerosive reflux.

Rune Erichsen1, Douglas Robertson, Dora K Farkas, Lars Pedersen, Heiko Pohl, John A Baron, Henrik T Sørensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a strong risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, but it is not clear whether the mucosal inflammation that develops in patients with reflux disease promotes this cancer. We determined the development of adenocarcinoma among patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were found to have erosive (with esophagitis) or nonerosive (without esophagitis) reflux.
METHODS: We performed a nationwide cohort study using data from 33,849 patients with reflux disease (52% men; median age, 59.3 y) from population-based Danish medical registries, from 1996 through 2008. The observed incidences of adenocarcinoma were compared with the expected incidence for the general population, standardized by age, sex, and calendar time. Absolute risks were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: In the study cohort, 26,194 of the patients (77%) had erosive reflux disease and 37 subsequently developed esophageal adenocarcinoma after a mean follow-up time of 7.4 years. Their absolute risk after 10 years was 0.24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15%-0.32%). The incidence of cancer among patients with erosive reflux disease was significantly greater than that expected for the general population (standardized incidence ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.0). In contrast, of the 7655 patients with nonerosive reflux disease, only 1 was diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma after 4.5 years of follow-up evaluation (standardized incidence ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.01-1.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Erosive reflux disease, but not nonerosive disease, increased the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on analysis of population-based Danish medical registries. Inflammation therefore might be an important factor in the progression from reflux to esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245963     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  18 in total

1.  Oesophageal and proximal gastric adenocarcinomas are rare after detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Shria Kumar; David C Metz; Gregory G Ginsberg; David E Kaplan; David S Goldberg
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Intake of vegetables and fruit and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Bailing Li; Gengxi Jiang; Guanxin Zhang; Qing Xue; Hao Zhang; Chong Wang; Tiejun Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy.

Authors:  Jean Marc Chevallier; Gustavo A Arman; Martino Guenzi; Cedric Rau; Mathieu Bruzzi; Nathan Beaupel; Frank Zinzindohoué; Anne Berger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Etiology, cancer stem cells and potential diagnostic biomarkers for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kuancan Liu; Tingting Zhao; Junkai Wang; Yunyun Chen; Rui Zhang; Xiaopeng Lan; Jianwen Que
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Oesophageal cancer--an overview.

Authors:  Michael Schweigert; Attila Dubecz; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  The epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Barrett's carcinoma.

Authors:  Joachim Labenz; Herbert Koop; Andrea Tannapfel; Ralf Kiesslich; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Predictors of Progression to High-Grade Dysplasia or Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Matthew J Whitson; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 6 (NEK6) genes are upregulated in erosive esophagitis and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elmas Kasap; Seda Örenay Boyacioglu; Mehmet Korkmaz; Elif Saritas Yuksel; Belkis Unsal; Erkan Kahraman; Omer Ozütemiz; Hakan Yuceyar
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Stromal cells participate in the murine esophageal mucosal injury response.

Authors:  Anisa Shaker; Jana Binkley; Isra Darwech; Elzbieta Swietlicki; Keely McDonald; Rodney Newberry; Deborah C Rubin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Kang; Jian-Chun Yu; Zhi-Qiang Ma; Zi-Ran Zhao; Qing-Bin Meng; Xin Ye
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.