Literature DB >> 22244265

Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.

Joshua J Meeks1, James A Eastham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A positive surgical margin (PSM) in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen is associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and the need for adjuvant radiation therapy, and is a surrogate for surgical quality. We review the available data describing the identification, anatomy, and management of PSM after RP.
METHODS: A PubMed search (using English language as a filter) was performed to identify factors affecting PSMs and their management.
RESULTS: PSMs are associated with an increased likelihood of BCR after RP. The most common location for a PSM is the apex, followed by the posterolateral edge of the prostate. The risk of recurrence in a patient with a PSM is associated with the location, length, and Gleason score of the PSM. The management of a patient with a PSM remains controversial, with some recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for all PSMs and others suggesting only salvage radiation therapy for men who experience BCR.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMs are associated with an increased likelihood of BCR and often result in initiation of adjuvant treatment. Therefore, the goal of surgery should be to minimize the likelihood of a PSM.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; Positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244265     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Jacqueline Bachofner; Anna Jelena Britschgi; Karim Saba; Ashkan Mortezavi; Basil Kaufmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Peter Wild; Tullio Sulser; Thomas Hermanns; Daniel Eberli; Cédric Poyet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Alberto Diminutto; Matteo Brunelli; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-05

4.  The effect of Rapid Access Prostate Clinics on the outcomes of Gleason 7 prostate cancer: does earlier diagnosis lead to better outcomes?

Authors:  M P Broe; J C Forde; M S Inder; D J Galvin; D W Mulvin; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Lei Wang; Xinmin Zheng; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Locally advanced prostate cancer imaging findings and implications for treatment from the surgical perspective.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Vishnupriya Kuchana; Rizwan Aslam; Ashish Kamat; Priya R Bhosale; A R Klekers
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

Review 7.  Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor Srougi; Jose Bessa; Mohammed Baghdadi; Igor Nunes-Silva; Jose Batista da Costa; Silvia Garcia-Barreras; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

9.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: 10 years of cases at Ramathibodi Hospital.

Authors:  Kun Sirisopana; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Premsant Sangkum; Kittinut Kijvikai; Suthep Pacharatakul; Charoen Leenanupun; Wachira Kochakarn; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10

10.  Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; James A Eastham
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.