PURPOSE: To investigate, via numerical simulations, the compliance of the specific absorption rate (SAR) versus temperature guidelines for the human head in magnetic resonance imaging procedures utilizing parallel transmission at high field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A combination of finite element and finite-difference time-domain methods was used to calculate the evolution of the temperature distribution in the human head for a large number of parallel transmission scenarios. The computations were performed on a new model containing 20 anatomical structures. RESULTS: Among all the radiofrequency field exposure schemes simulated, the recommended 39°C maximum local temperature was never exceeded when the local 10-g average SAR threshold was reached. On the other hand, the maximum temperature barely complied with its guideline when the global SAR reached 3.2 W/kg. The maximal temperature in the eye could very well rise by more than 1°C in both cases. CONCLUSION: Considering parallel transmission, the recommended values of local 10-g SAR may remain a relevant metric to ensure that the local temperature inside the human head never exceeds 39°C, although it can lead to rises larger than 1°C in the eye. Monitoring temperature instead of SAR can provide increased flexibility in pulse design for parallel transmission.
PURPOSE: To investigate, via numerical simulations, the compliance of the specific absorption rate (SAR) versus temperature guidelines for the human head in magnetic resonance imaging procedures utilizing parallel transmission at high field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A combination of finite element and finite-difference time-domain methods was used to calculate the evolution of the temperature distribution in the human head for a large number of parallel transmission scenarios. The computations were performed on a new model containing 20 anatomical structures. RESULTS: Among all the radiofrequency field exposure schemes simulated, the recommended 39°C maximum local temperature was never exceeded when the local 10-g average SAR threshold was reached. On the other hand, the maximum temperature barely complied with its guideline when the global SAR reached 3.2 W/kg. The maximal temperature in the eye could very well rise by more than 1°C in both cases. CONCLUSION: Considering parallel transmission, the recommended values of local 10-g SAR may remain a relevant metric to ensure that the local temperature inside the human head never exceeds 39°C, although it can lead to rises larger than 1°C in the eye. Monitoring temperature instead of SAR can provide increased flexibility in pulse design for parallel transmission.
Authors: Sukhoon Oh; Yeun-Chul Ryu; Giuseppe Carluccio; Christopher T Sica; Christopher M Collins Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nicolas Boulant; Xiaoping Wu; Gregor Adriany; Sebastian Schmitter; Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nadine N Graedel; Jonathan R Polimeni; Bastien Guerin; Borjan Gagoski; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bart R Steensma; Ettore F Meliadò; Peter Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alexander J E Raaijmakers Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.044