PURPOSE: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. METHODS: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. RESULTS: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. CONCLUSION: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.
PURPOSE: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. METHODS: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. RESULTS: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. CONCLUSION: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.
Authors: Sarah E Gollust; Stacy W Gray; Deanna Alexis Carere; Barbara A Koenig; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Amy L McGUIRE; Richard R Sharp; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; N A Wang; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Emily Olfson; Sarah Hartz; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; Laura J Bierut Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Stacy W Gray; Sarah E Gollust; Deanna Alexis Carere; Clara A Chen; Angel Cronin; Sarah S Kalia; Huma Q Rana; Mack T Ruffin; Catharine Wang; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jenny E Ostergren; Michele C Gornick; Deanna Alexis Carere; Sarah S Kalia; Wendy R Uhlmann; Mack T Ruffin; Joanna L Mountain; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Marilyn E Coors; Kristen M Raymond; Shannon K McWilliams; Christian J Hopfer; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Deanna Alexis Carere; Peter Kraft; Kimberly A Kaphingst; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Susanne F Meisel; Deanna Alexis Carere; Jane Wardle; Sarah S Kalia; Tanya A Moreno; Joanna L Mountain; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green Journal: Genome Med Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 11.117