Literature DB >> 20690815

Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.

Colleen M McBride1, Christopher H Wade, Kimberly A Kaphingst.   

Abstract

In this report, we describe the evolution and types of genetic information provided directly to consumers, discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these products, and review research evaluating consumer responses to direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. The available evidence to date has focused on predictive tests and does not suggest that individuals, health care providers, or health care systems have been harmed by a DTC provision of genetic information. An understanding of consumer responses to susceptibility tests has lagged behind. The Multiplex Initiative is presented as a case study of research to understand consumers' responses to DTC susceptibility tests. Three priority areas are recommended for accelerated research activities to inform public policy regarding DTC genetic information: (a) exploring consumer's long-term responses to DTC genetic testing on a comprehensive set of outcomes, (b) evaluating optimal services to support decision making about genetic testing, and (c) evaluating best practices in promoting genetic competencies among health providers.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20690815     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet        ISSN: 1527-8204            Impact factor:   8.929


  38 in total

1.  Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.

Authors:  Yeyang Su; Heidi C Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-05-28

2.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Implications of Internet availability of genomic information for public health practice.

Authors:  B W Hesse; N K Arora; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli M Bollinger; Rachel L Dvoskin; Joan A Scott
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Commentary: Children and predictive genomic testing: disease prevention, research protection, and our future.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Kenneth P Tercyak; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-08-04

Review 7.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) in Clinical Genetics Research.

Authors:  Daryl Pullman; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

9.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Peter R Harris; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.