Literature DB >> 22241101

A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling: findings from a randomized controlled trial.

Akke Albada1, Sandra van Dulmen, Margreet G E M Ausems, Jozien M Bensing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The initial breast cancer genetic counseling visit is mainly educational, with large amounts of relatively standard information and little counselee participation. Counselors might provide more counselee-specific information if counselees would participate more. A pre-visit website providing computer-tailored information and a question prompt sheet (QPS) might help counselees to pursue a more active role.
METHODS: Counselees were randomized to receive usual care (UC) or UC plus the pre-visit website. The QPS questions were sent to the counselor before the visit. All counselees completed a baseline questionnaire, and visits were videotaped.
RESULTS: Intervention-group counselees (n = 102) did not ask more questions than UC-group counselees (n = 90). However, counselees in the intervention group more often shared their agenda (B = 10.37; confidence interval (CI) 2.68-18.06; P = 0.01), directed the communication (B = 0.41; CI 0.28-0.53; P = 0.01), and paraphrased the counselors' words (B = 5.18; CI 0.43-9.92; P = 0.03). Counselors introduced and answered the QPS questions. As a result, they provided more information about the topics of these questions, and the information provided was more specific to whether there was an indication for DNA testing.
CONCLUSION: A pre-visit website with QPS helped counselees to communicate more assertively. As a result, the information provided was more counselee specific, without affecting the visit duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241101     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  17 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Community attitudes towards a Jewish community BRCA1/2 testing program.

Authors:  Nicole Cousens; Rajneesh Kaur; Bettina Meiser; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  User engagement with web-based genomics education videos and implications for designing scalable patient education materials.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Wei Wei; Xinhang Li; Yat S So; Suzanne Bakken; Chunhua Weng; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

5.  Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms.

Authors:  Becky A Purkaple; James W Mold; Sixia Chen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.

Authors:  Marsa Gholamzadeh; Hamidreza Abtahi; Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tomas Pantoja; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Nathalie Colomer; Carla Castañon; Javiera Leniz Martelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-18

9.  The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care.

Authors:  Salma Shickh; Sara A Rafferty; Marc Clausen; Rita Kodida; Chloe Mighton; Seema Panchal; Justin Lorentz; Thomas Ward; Nicholas Watkins; Christine Elser; Andrea Eisen; June C Carroll; Emily Glogowski; Kasmintan A Schrader; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Raymond H Kim; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 8.864

10.  Improving preclinic preparation for patients with chronic conditions in quito, ecuador: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Rodriguez; E Kaselitz; J Wong; S Ligard; D Peck; V Hugo Mena; F Gordillo; D Serlin; M Heisler
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2015-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.