Literature DB >> 22240848

A cohort study on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds.

E Lenselink1, A Andriessen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This cohort study evaluated the clinical efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing, Suprasorb X+PHMB (Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH), for the eradication of biofilms in non-healing wounds. Polyhexanide (PHMB) has been shown to have microbicidal activity when applied to chronic wounds and burns.
METHOD: Twenty-eight patients, aged over 18 years, who presented at an outpatient wound clinic with non-healing locally infected and/or critically colonised wounds of various aetiologies that showed clinical signs of biofilm were included in the study. Sixteen patients (nine females), with a mean age of 60.9±21.6 years, were included in the analysis. The patients were prospectively followed for a maximum of 24 weeks or until healing for analysis of safety and efficacy endpoints. Evolution of wound size was conducted with tracings and standardised digital photographs as well as for determining healing rates.
RESULTS: At 24 weeks,12 wounds (75%) had healed (complete epithelialisation with no drainage). Of those wounds that had not closed, the mean wound area had reduced by 61% at week 24. Ten patients (63%) had a good reduction of the biofilm, five (32%) scored moderate and one (6%) had no reduction noted at week 24. The mean percentage of granulation tissue had increased significantly (p<0.04) when comparing day 0 (38%) with week 24 (77%). Yellow tissue present in the wound bed decreased (p<0.01): 62% (day 0) versus 23% (week 24). All patients reported reduced pain after dressing change.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that continuous application of PHMB, using a biocellulose wound dressing, reduced biofilm in the stagnating wounds treated, thus promoting healing. The treatment was comfortable, safe and reduced wound pain at dressing change. The PHMB-containing biocellulose dressing seems to be suitable for lightly to moderately exuding wounds. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: This study was supported by a scientific grant from Lohmann & Rauscher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22240848     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.11.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Antimicrobial Hydrogels.

Authors:  Simon Finnegan; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Microscopy visualisation confirms multi-species biofilms are ubiquitous in diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Khalid Johani; Matthew Malone; Slade Jensen; Iain Gosbell; Hugh Dickson; Honhua Hu; Karen Vickery
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Clinician perceptions of wound biofilm.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Review of Antibiofilm Agents for Wound Care.

Authors:  Maximillian A Weigelt; Stephanie A McNamara; Daniela Sanchez; Penelope A Hirt; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Advanced Wound Diagnostics: Toward Transforming Wound Care into Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Maximillian A Weigelt; Hadar A Lev-Tov; Marjana Tomic-Canic; W David Lee; Ryan Williams; David Strasfeld; Robert S Kirsner; Ira M Herman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  In vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on P. aeruginosa Wound Biofilm.

Authors:  Ewa Klara Stuermer; Isabell Plattfaut; Michael Dietrich; Florian Brill; Andreas Kampe; Vanessa Wiencke; Anna Ulatowski; Maria Geffken; Julian-Dario Rembe; Ella Alexandrovna Naumova; Sebastian Eike Debus; Ralf Smeets
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  GNPs-CS/KGM as hemostatic first aid wound dressing with antibiotic effect: in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Li Fan; Chong Cheng; Youbei Qiao; Fei Li; Wei Li; Hong Wu; Bo Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Recent developments in topical wound therapy: impact of antimicrobiological changes and rebalancing the wound milieu.

Authors:  Cornelia Erfurt-Berge; Regina Renner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Biofilm delays wound healing: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.