Literature DB >> 25196188

Clinician perceptions of wound biofilm.

Daniel G Metcalf1, Philip G Bowler2.   

Abstract

In wound care today, biofilm is a subject area of great interest and debate. There is an increasing awareness that biofilm exists in the majority of non-healing wounds, and that it is implicated in both recalcitrance and infection. Together with the presence of devitalised host tissue, biofilm is recognised as a component of the wound environment that requires removal to enable wound progression. However, uncertainty exists among wound care practitioners regarding confirmation of the presence of biofilm, and how best to remove biofilm from a non-healing wound. While recent efforts have been taken to assist practitioners in signs and symptoms of wound biofilm, continuing research is required to characterise and confirm wound biofilm. This research was conducted as part of a market research process to better understand the knowledge levels, experiences, clinical awareness and impact of biofilm in wound care, which was undertaken across the USA and Europe. While knowledge levels and experiences vary from country to country, certain wound characteristics were consistently associated with the presence of biofilm.
© 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Clinician; Healing; Perceptions; Wound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25196188      PMCID: PMC7950048          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  23 in total

1.  Development of a novel, highly quantitative in vivo model for the study of biofilm-impaired cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Anandev N Gurjala; Matthew R Geringer; Akhil K Seth; Seok J Hong; Mark S Smeltzer; Robert D Galiano; Kai P Leung; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Potential implications of biofilm in chronic wounds: a case series.

Authors:  J Hurlow; P G Bowler
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Visible biofilms - a controversial issue!

Authors:  Tracy Cowan
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 4.  Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Niels Høiby; Claus Moser; J William Costerton; Annette Moter; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-02

5.  Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window.

Authors:  R D Wolcott; K P Rumbaugh; G James; G Schultz; P Phillips; Q Yang; C Watters; P S Stewart; S E Dowd
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds with clinical wound care strategies: a quantitative study using an in vivo rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Matthew R Geringer; Anandev N Gurjala; Seok J Hong; Robert D Galiano; Kai P Leung; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Biofilms in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Ellen Swogger; Randall Wolcott; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Patrick Secor; Jennifer Sestrich; John W Costerton; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Clinical experience with wound biofilm and management: a case series.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Burns, biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis.

Authors:  Peter Kennedy; Susan Brammah; Edward Wills
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Ø Jensen; Mustafa Fazli; Kit G Madsen; Jette Pedersen; Claus Moser; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; David Parsons; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Safety and performance evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Keith G Harding; Marek Szczepkowski; Jacek Mikosiński; Krystyna Twardowska-Saucha; Stephen Blair; Nicola M Ivins; Wojciech Saucha; Jane Cains; Kim Peters; David Parsons; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Silver oxynitrate, an unexplored silver compound with antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity.

Authors:  Joe A Lemire; Lindsay Kalan; Alexandru Bradu; Raymond J Turner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A peptide from human β thymosin as a platform for the development of new anti-biofilm agents for Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Domenico Schillaci; Angelo Spinello; Maria Grazia Cusimano; Stella Cascioferro; Giampaolo Barone; Maria Vitale; Vincenzo Arizza
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends.

Authors:  Federica Paladini; Mauro Pollini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Antibiofilm Properties of Antiseptic Agents Used on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Koko Barrigah-Benissan; Jerome Ory; Catherine Dunyach-Remy; Cassandra Pouget; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Albert Sotto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of a Recombinant Fragment of β-Thymosin of Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Angelo Spinello; Maria Grazia Cusimano; Domenico Schillaci; Luigi Inguglia; Giampaolo Barone; Vincenzo Arizza
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.