| Literature DB >> 22239253 |
Chunxiang Fu1, Ramanjulu Sunkar, Chuanen Zhou, Hui Shen, Ji-Yi Zhang, Jessica Matts, Jennifer Wolf, David G J Mann, C Neal Stewart, Yuhong Tang, Zeng-Yu Wang.
Abstract
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has been developed into a dedicated herbaceous bioenergy crop. Biomass yield is a major target trait for genetic improvement of switchgrass. microRNAs have emerged as a prominent class of gene regulatory factors that has the potential to improve complex traits such as biomass yield. A miR156b precursor was overexpressed in switchgrass. The effects of miR156 overexpression on SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN LIKE (SPL) genes were revealed by microarray and quantitative RT-PCR analyses. Morphological alterations, biomass yield, saccharification efficiency and forage digestibility of the transgenic plants were characterized. miR156 controls apical dominance and floral transition in switchgrass by suppressing its target SPL genes. Relatively low levels of miR156 overexpression were sufficient to increase biomass yield while producing plants with normal flowering time. Moderate levels of miR156 led to improved biomass but the plants were non-flowering. These two groups of plants produced 58%-101% more biomass yield compared with the control. However, high miR156 levels resulted in severely stunted growth. The degree of morphological alterations of the transgenic switchgrass depends on miR156 level. Compared with floral transition, a lower miR156 level is required to disrupt apical dominance. The improvement in biomass yield was mainly because of the increase in tiller number. Targeted overexpression of miR156 also improved solubilized sugar yield and forage digestibility, and offered an effective approach for transgene containment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22239253 PMCID: PMC3489066 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00677.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Morphological characterization of transgenic switchgrass plants overexpressing miR156b. Representative plants from each group are shown: T-35 (group I), T-37 (group II) and T-44 (group III).
Figure 2Transcript abundance of pre-miR156b and mature miR156 in transgenic switchgrass plants. (a) Transcript abundance of miR156 precursor in transgenic plants revealed by quantitative RT-PCR. Switchgrass Ubq1 was used as the reference for normalization. (b) The mature miR156 level of transgenic plants detected and quantified by a highly sensitive quantitative real-time PCR method. miRNA390 was used as the reference for normalization. (c) Small RNA blot analysis of miR156 level in transgenic switchgrass plants. Ctrl: non-transformed plant serving as control. The blot was stripped and rehybridized with oligonucleotide probe complementary to U6 RNA as a loading control.
Figure 3Transcript abundance of putative miR156-targeted SPL genes in transgenic switchgrass plants. Transcript abundance of PvSPL1, PvSPL2, PvSPL3 and PvSPL6 was revealed by quantitative RT-PCR. Switchgrass Ubq1 was used as the reference for normalization.
Figure 4Tiller number (a) and biomass yield (b) of transgenic switchgrass plants. The transgenic and control plants were harvested after 6-month growth in the greenhouse. Values are means ± SE (n = 3).
Morphological characterization of transgenic switchgrass plants
| Plant height (cm) | Leaf blade length (cm) | Leaf blade width (cm) | Leaf sheath length (cm) | Internode length (cm) | Internode diameter (mm) | Rang of internode number | Flowering time (day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 242.3 ± 8.6 | 49.4 ± 3.7 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | 18.4 ± 1.6 | 21.3 ± 1.5 | 3.76 ± 0.23 | 4–6 | 92 ± 2 |
| T0-14 | 269.5 ± 10.6 | 41.0 ± 0.6 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 21.5 ± 1.9 | 2.63 ± 0.12 | 5–6 | 94 ± 2 |
| T0-35 | 232.8 ± 9.2 | 53.0 ± 4.8 | 1.06 ± 0.05 | 18.8 ± 2.9 | 23.1 ± 3.4 | 3.99 ± 0.18 | 4–6 | 93 ± 3 |
| T0-40 | 240.6 ± 10.1 | 52.0 ± 4.7 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 19.0 ± 1.9 | 21.8 ± 1.4 | 4.05 ± 0.07 | 4–6 | 93 ± 2 |
| T0-27 | 108.8 ± 5.2 | 43.0 ± 1.1 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 20.6 ± 1.1 | 1.50 ± 0.12 | 7–8 | >360 |
| T0-32 | 117.3 ± 3.7 | 43.0 ± 2.9 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | 19.5 ± 1.7 | 1.70 ± 0.18 | 6–8 | >360 |
| T0-37 | 110.5 ± 3.5 | 41.4 ± 1.0 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 12.6 ± 0.9 | 19.6 ± 0.6 | 1.57 ± 0.04 | 7–8 | >360 |
| T0-34 | 36.0 ± 2.5 | 22.0 ± 1.4 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 0.58 ± 0.12 | 7–8 | >360 |
| T0-44 | 27.5 ± 1.9 | 15.6 ± 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 6–8 | >360 |
Plant height of switchgrass was measured after 6-month growth in the greenhouse. Five-month-old tillers were used to measure internode length (internode 3), internode diameter (internode 3), internode number, leaf sheath length, leaf blade length and width. Five tillers were measured for each replicate. Value are mean ± SE (n = 3). One or two asterisks indicate significance corresponding to P < 0.05 or 0.01 (one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test).
Figure 5Saccharification efficiency (a) and solubilized sugar yield (b) of transgenic switchgrass plants. Values are means ± SE (n = 3). One or two asterisks indicate significance corresponding to P < 0.05 or 0.01 (one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test).
Forage quality analysis of transgenic switchgrass plants
| IVTDMD (%) | ADL (mg/g DW) | Crude protein (mg/g DW) | Extractive component (mg/g DW) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 62.9 ± 1.4 | 75.1 ± 3.6 | 107.7 ± 5.2 | 281.7 ± 7.5 |
| T-14 | 62.1 ± 0.4 | 82.3 ± 0.1 | 109.2 ± 0.6 | 283.3 ± 12.0 |
| T-35 | 67.1 ± 0.1* | 68.4 ± 0.8 | 110.0 ± 0.5 | 296.7 ± 3.3 |
| T-40 | 64.5 ± 0.1 | 68.7 ± 1.0 | 123.5 ± 1.1* | 266.7 ± 17.7 |
| T-27 | 67.8 ± 0.1** | 65.8 ± 1.9 | 118.7 ± 0.9 | 310.0 ± 5.8 |
| T-32 | 66.5 ± 0.2* | 68.5 ± 0.7 | 116.5 ± 1.9 | 296.7 ± 8.8 |
| T-37 | 66.7 ± 0.3* | 67.4 ± 0.2 | 120.5 ± 1.2 | 280.0 ± 11.6 |
| T-34 | 70.3 ± 0.2** | 70.2 ± 1.7 | 126.8 ± 0.5** | 350.0 ± 10.0** |
| T-44 | 74.7 ± 0.3** | 65.4 ± 2.2 | 143.3 ± 1.0** | 353.3 ± 6.8** |
ADL, acid detergent lignin; IVTDMD, in vitro true dry matter digestibility. *The transgenic and control plants were harvested after 6-month growth in the greenhouse. Value are mean ± SE (n = 3). One or two asterisks indicate significance corresponding to P < 0.05 or 0.01 (one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test).