Igor Dozmorov1, Michael Centola. 1. Department of Arthritis and Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73105, USA. igor-dozmorov@omrf.ouhsc.edu
Abstract
MOTIVATION: We face the absence of optimized standards to guide normalization, comparative analysis, and interpretation of data sets. One aspect of this is that current methods of statistical analysis do not adequately utilize the information inherent in the large data sets generated in a microarray experiment and require a tradeoff between detection sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We present a multistep procedure for analysis of mRNA expression data obtained from cDNA array methods. To identify and classify differentially expressed genes, results from standard paired t-test of normalized data are compared with those from a novel method, denoted an associative analysis. This method associates experimental gene expressions presented as residuals in regression analysis against control averaged expressions to a common standard-the family of similarly computed residuals for low variability genes derived from control experiments. By associating changes in expression of a given gene to a large family of equally expressed genes of the control group, this method utilizes the large data sets inherent in microarray experiments to increase both specificity and sensitivity. The overall procedure is illustrated by tabulation of genes whose expression differs significantly between Snell dwarf mice (dw/dw) and their phenotypically normal littermates (dw/+, +/+). Of the 2,352 genes examined only 450-500 were expressed above the background levels observed in nonexpressed genes and of these 120 were established as differentially expressed in dwarf mice at a significance level that excludes appearance of false positive determinations.
MOTIVATION: We face the absence of optimized standards to guide normalization, comparative analysis, and interpretation of data sets. One aspect of this is that current methods of statistical analysis do not adequately utilize the information inherent in the large data sets generated in a microarray experiment and require a tradeoff between detection sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We present a multistep procedure for analysis of mRNA expression data obtained from cDNA array methods. To identify and classify differentially expressed genes, results from standard paired t-test of normalized data are compared with those from a novel method, denoted an associative analysis. This method associates experimental gene expressions presented as residuals in regression analysis against control averaged expressions to a common standard-the family of similarly computed residuals for low variability genes derived from control experiments. By associating changes in expression of a given gene to a large family of equally expressed genes of the control group, this method utilizes the large data sets inherent in microarray experiments to increase both specificity and sensitivity. The overall procedure is illustrated by tabulation of genes whose expression differs significantly between Snell dwarf mice (dw/dw) and their phenotypically normal littermates (dw/+, +/+). Of the 2,352 genes examined only 450-500 were expressed above the background levels observed in nonexpressed genes and of these 120 were established as differentially expressed in dwarf mice at a significance level that excludes appearance of false positive determinations.
Authors: Xin Yan; Feng Li; Igor Dozmorov; Mark Barton Frank; Ming Dao; Michael Centola; Wei Cao; Dan Hu Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: Igor Dozmorov; Nicholas Knowlton; Yuhong Tang; Alan Shields; Parima Pathipvanich; James N Jarvis; Michael Centola Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-10-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: J Leland Booth; Elizabeth S Duggan; Vineet I Patel; Wenxin Wu; Dennis M Burian; David C Hutchings; Vicky L White; K Mark Coggeshall; Mikhail G Dozmorov; Jordan P Metcalf Journal: Microb Pathog Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Troy R Torgerson; Anna Genin; Chunxia Chen; Mingce Zhang; Bin Zhou; Stephanie Añover-Sombke; M Barton Frank; Igor Dozmorov; Elizabeth Ocheltree; Petri Kulmala; Michael Centola; Hans D Ochs; Andrew D Wells; Randy Q Cron Journal: J Immunol Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Lina Gallego-Giraldo; Kishor Bhattarai; Catalina I Pislariu; Jin Nakashima; Yusuke Jikumaru; Yuji Kamiya; Michael K Udvardi; Maria J Monteros; Richard A Dixon Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Marina A Naoumkina; Luzia V Modolo; David V Huhman; Ewa Urbanczyk-Wochniak; Yuhong Tang; Lloyd W Sumner; Richard A Dixon Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Neal D Teaster; Christy M Motes; Yuhong Tang; William C Wiant; Matthew Q Cotter; Yuh-Shuh Wang; Aruna Kilaru; Barney J Venables; Karl H Hasenstein; Gabriel Gonzalez; Elison B Blancaflor; Kent D Chapman Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: M Teresa de la Morena; Jennifer L Eitson; Igor M Dozmorov; Serkan Belkaya; Ashley R Hoover; Esperanza Anguiano; M Virginia Pascual; Nicolai S C van Oers Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 3.969