| Literature DB >> 22238548 |
Hany M Mohamed1, Ashraf H F Abd El-Wahab, Ahmed M El-Agrody, Ahmed H Bedair, Fathy A Eid, Mostafa M Khafagy, Kamal A Abd-El-Rehem.
Abstract
A series of 6,8-diiodocoumarin-3-N-carboxamides (4-11) were prepared. Treatment of ethyl 6,8-diiodocoumarin-3-carboxylate (1) with ethyl cyanoacetate/NH(4)OAc gave ethyl 2-(3-carbamoyl-6,8-diiodocoumarin-4-yl)-2-cyanoacetate (12) and 2-amino-4-hydroxy-7,9-diiodocoumarino[3,4-c]pyridine-1-carbonitrile (13), and treatment with acetone in the presence of NH(4)OAc or methylamine gave the ethyl 4-oxo-2,6-methano-2-methyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-8,10-diiodobenzo[2,1-g]-2H-1,3-oxazocine-5-carboxylate derivatives 14a,b. All compounds were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity and the compounds 12-14a,b exhibited a pronounced effect on all tested microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: 3,5-diiodosalicylaldehyde; Michael reaction; antimicrobial; coumarins; diethyl malonate; ethyl cyanoacetate
Year: 2011 PMID: 22238548 PMCID: PMC3252874 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.7.199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Synthesis of 6,8-diiodocoumarin derivatives 1–7.
Scheme 2Proposed fragmentation pathways for the EI ions of the substituted 6,8-diiodocoumarins 3 and 7.
Scheme 3Synthesis of 6,8-diiodocoumarin-3-N-carboxamide derivatives 8–11.
Scheme 4Synthesis of ethyl cyanoacetate and pyridine derivatives 12 and 13.
Scheme 5Synthesis of 1,3-oxazocine derivatives 14a,b.
Biological activity of the newly synthesized compounds.
| Compound | Inhibition-zone diameter (mm/mg sample) | |||||
| Gram-positive | Gram-negative | Fungi | ||||
| 10 | 11 | 15 | 10 | 9 | – | |
| 13 | 10 | – | 13 | – | 10 | |
| 16 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | |
| 15 | 14 | 12 | 10 | – | – | |
| 10 | 12 | – | 15 | 10 | – | |
| 10 | 10 | – | 15 | 11 | – | |
| 20 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 15 | |
| 22 | 22 | 22 | 17 | 14 | 13 | |
| 22 | 15 | 22 | 15 | 17 | 11 | |
| 20 | 22 | 20 | – | 15 | 12 | |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 26 | 16 | 18 | |
| 27 | 28 | 28 | 26 | 17 | 17 | |
| 26 | 28 | 27 | 28 | 15 | 14 | |
| 25 | 26 | 25 | 27 | 18 | 15 | |
| Ampicillin | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | – | – |
| Calforan | – | – | – | – | 20 | 20 |
ac = 1 mg mL–1 in DMF.
Figure 1Graphical representation of the antibacterial activity of tested compounds compared to ampicillin.
Figure 2Graphical representation of antifungal activity of tested compounds, compared to calforan.