MOTIVATION: The relative abundance of retroviral insertions in a host genome is important in understanding the persistence and pathogenesis of both natural retroviral infections and retroviral gene therapy vectors. It could be estimated from a sample of cells if only the host genomic sites of retroviral insertions could be directly counted. When host genomic DNA is randomly broken via sonication and then amplified, amplicons of varying lengths are produced. The number of unique lengths of amplicons of an insertion site tends to increase according to its abundance, providing a basis for estimating relative abundance. However, as abundance increases amplicons of the same length arise by chance leading to a non-linear relation between the number of unique lengths and relative abundance. The difficulty in calibrating this relation is compounded by sample-specific variations in the relative frequencies of clones of each length. RESULTS: A likelihood function is proposed for the discrete lengths observed in each of a collection of insertion sites and is maximized with a hybrid expectation-maximization algorithm. Patient data illustrate the method and simulations show that relative abundance can be estimated with little bias, but that variation in highly abundant sites can be large. In replicated patient samples, variation exceeds what the model implies-requiring adjustment as in Efron (2004) or using jackknife standard errors. Consequently, it is advantageous to collect replicate samples to strengthen inferences about relative abundance.
MOTIVATION: The relative abundance of retroviral insertions in a host genome is important in understanding the persistence and pathogenesis of both natural retroviral infections and retroviral gene therapy vectors. It could be estimated from a sample of cells if only the host genomic sites of retroviral insertions could be directly counted. When host genomic DNA is randomly broken via sonication and then amplified, amplicons of varying lengths are produced. The number of unique lengths of amplicons of an insertion site tends to increase according to its abundance, providing a basis for estimating relative abundance. However, as abundance increases amplicons of the same length arise by chance leading to a non-linear relation between the number of unique lengths and relative abundance. The difficulty in calibrating this relation is compounded by sample-specific variations in the relative frequencies of clones of each length. RESULTS: A likelihood function is proposed for the discrete lengths observed in each of a collection of insertion sites and is maximized with a hybrid expectation-maximization algorithm. Patient data illustrate the method and simulations show that relative abundance can be estimated with little bias, but that variation in highly abundant sites can be large. In replicated patient samples, variation exceeds what the model implies-requiring adjustment as in Efron (2004) or using jackknife standard errors. Consequently, it is advantageous to collect replicate samples to strengthen inferences about relative abundance.
Authors: Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina; Christof von Kalle; Manfred Schmidt; Françoise Le Deist; Nicolas Wulffraat; Elisabeth McIntyre; Isabelle Radford; Jean-Luc Villeval; Christopher C Fraser; Marina Cavazzana-Calvo; Alain Fischer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Astrid R W Schröder; Paul Shinn; Huaming Chen; Charles Berry; Joseph R Ecker; Frederic Bushman Journal: Cell Date: 2002-08-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: D Finzi; M Hermankova; T Pierson; L M Carruth; C Buck; R E Chaisson; T C Quinn; K Chadwick; J Margolick; R Brookmeyer; J Gallant; M Markowitz; D D Ho; D D Richman; R F Siliciano Journal: Science Date: 1997-11-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Nicolas A Gillet; Nirav Malani; Anat Melamed; Niall Gormley; Richard Carter; David Bentley; Charles Berry; Frederic D Bushman; Graham P Taylor; Charles R M Bangham Journal: Blood Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Manfred Schmidt; Denise A Carbonaro; Carsten Speckmann; Manuela Wissler; John Bohnsack; Melissa Elder; Bruce J Aronow; Jan A Nolta; Donald B Kohn; Christof von Kalle Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-03-17 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Daniel Aird; Michael G Ross; Wei-Sheng Chen; Maxwell Danielsson; Timothy Fennell; Carsten Russ; David B Jaffe; Chad Nusbaum; Andreas Gnirke Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Troy Brady; Shoshannah L Roth; Nirav Malani; Gary P Wang; Charles C Berry; Philippe Leboulch; Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina; Marina Cavazzana-Calvo; Eirini P Papapetrou; Michel Sadelain; Harri Savilahti; Frederic D Bushman Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Rick S Mitchell; Brett F Beitzel; Astrid R W Schroder; Paul Shinn; Huaming Chen; Charles C Berry; Joseph R Ecker; Frederic D Bushman Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2004-08-17 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Samson J Koelle; Diego A Espinoza; Chuanfeng Wu; Jason Xu; Rong Lu; Brian Li; Robert E Donahue; Cynthia E Dunbar Journal: Blood Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer E Adair; Brian C Beard; Grant D Trobridge; Tobias Neff; Jason K Rockhill; Daniel L Silbergeld; Maciej M Mrugala; Hans-Peter Kiem Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Rebecca T Veenhuis; Abena K Kwaa; Caroline C Garliss; Rachel Latanich; Maria Salgado; Christopher W Pohlmeyer; Christopher L Nobles; John Gregg; Eileen P Scully; Justin R Bailey; Frederic D Bushman; Joel N Blankson Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-09-20
Authors: Lillian B Cohn; Israel T Silva; Thiago Y Oliveira; Rafael A Rosales; Erica H Parrish; Gerald H Learn; Beatrice H Hahn; Julie L Czartoski; M Juliana McElrath; Clara Lehmann; Florian Klein; Marina Caskey; Bruce D Walker; Janet D Siliciano; Robert F Siliciano; Mila Jankovic; Michel C Nussenzweig Journal: Cell Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Martijn H Brugman; Julia D Suerth; Michael Rothe; Sebastian Suerbaum; Axel Schambach; Ute Modlich; Olga Kustikova; Christopher Baum Journal: Hum Gene Ther Methods Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 2.396
Authors: Christopher L Nobles; Scott Sherrill-Mix; John K Everett; Shantan Reddy; Joseph A Fraietta; David L Porter; Noelle Frey; Saar I Gill; Stephan A Grupp; Shannon L Maude; Donald L Siegel; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; Simon F Lacey; J Joseph Melenhorst; Frederic D Bushman Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: F Maldarelli; X Wu; L Su; F R Simonetti; W Shao; S Hill; J Spindler; A L Ferris; J W Mellors; M F Kearney; J M Coffin; S H Hughes Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 47.728