Literature DB >> 22238056

Representative baseline values on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) in adolescent athletes vary by gender, grade, and concussion history.

Tamara C Valovich McLeod1, R Curtis Bay, Kenneth C Lam, Anikar Chhabra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve and standardize the sideline evaluation of sports-related concussion, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) was developed. This tool assesses concussion-related signs and symptoms, cognition, balance, and coordination. This newly published assessment tool has not established representative baseline data on adolescent athletes. HYPOTHESIS: Representative baseline SCAT2 scores in adolescent athletes will differ by gender, grade in school, and self-reported concussion history. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study.
METHODS: Interscholastic athletes were administered the SCAT2 during a preseason concussion baseline testing session. The SCAT2 total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with lower scores indicating poorer performance. Overall, representative values were calculated using descriptive statistics. Separate independent-samples t tests, with gender and concussion history as the independent variables, and a 1-way analysis of variance, with grade as the independent variable, were conducted to assess differences in SCAT2 total score (P < .05).
RESULTS: There were 1134 high school athletes (872 male and 262 female) who participated. The SCAT2 total score across all participants was 88.3 ± 6.8 (range, 58-100); skewness was -0.86 ± 0.07, and kurtosis was 0.73 ± 0.14. Male athletes scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score (P = .03; 87.7 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.8), and 9th graders (86.9 ± 6.8) scored significantly lower than 11th (88.7 ± 7.0) and 12th (89.0 ± 6.6) graders (P < .001). Athletes with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score than those with no concussion history (P < .001; 87.0 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.5).
CONCLUSION: These data provide representative scores on the SCAT2 in adolescent athletes and show that male athletes, 9th graders, and those with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower than their female, upperclassmen, or nonconcussed peers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that healthy adolescent athletes display variability on the SCAT2 at baseline. Therefore, clinicians should administer baseline assessments of the SCAT2 because assuming a perfect baseline score of 100 points is not appropriate in an adolescent athlete population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22238056     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511431573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

1.  Instrumenting the balance error scoring system for use with patients reporting persistent balance problems after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Laurie A King; Fay B Horak; Martina Mancini; Donald Pierce; Kelsey C Priest; James Chesnutt; Patrick Sullivan; Julie C Chapman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review.

Authors:  Doug King; Matt Brughelli; Patria Hume; Conor Gissane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Differences in Symptom Reporting Between Males and Females at Baseline and After a Sports-Related Concussion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dana A Brown; Julie A Elsass; Ashley J Miller; Lauren E Reed; Jennifer C Reneker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Hawai'i Concussion Awareness & Management Program (HCAMP): Impact.

Authors:  Nathan M Murata; Ross S Oshiro; Troy Furutani; Pauline Mashima; Emily Thibault; Henry L Lew
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2019-05

Review 5.  If You're Not Measuring, You're Guessing: The Advent of Objective Concussion Assessments.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; Kevin M Guskiewicz; John Norwig
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Sports-related concussion: A narrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Cameron M Marshall
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-12

7.  Objective functional assessment after a head injury using movement and activity in physical space scores: a case report.

Authors:  James L Farnsworth; Danielle McElhiney; Shannon David; Gaurav Sinha; Brian G Ragan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sport concussion.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; Robert C Cantu; Gerard A Gioia; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jeffrey Kutcher; Michael Palm; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Accelerometers for the Assessment of Concussion in Male Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James H Brennan; Biswadev Mitra; Anneliese Synnot; Joanne McKenzie; Catherine Willmott; Andrew S McIntosh; Jerome J Maller; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Descriptive Values for Dancers on Baseline Concussion Tools.

Authors:  Lauren McIntyre; Marc Campo
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.