Literature DB >> 22237911

Egg phenotype matching by cuckoos in relation to discrimination by hosts and climatic conditions.

Jesús M Avilés1, Johan R Vikan, Frode Fossøy, Anton Antonov, Arne Moksnes, Eivin Røskaft, Jacqui A Shykoff, Anders P Møller, Bård G Stokke.   

Abstract

Although parasites and their hosts often coexist in a set of environmentally differentiated populations connected by gene flow, few empirical studies have considered a role of environmental variation in shaping correlations between traits of hosts and parasites. Here, we studied for the first time the association between the frequency of adaptive parasitic common cuckoo Cuculus canorus phenotypes in terms of egg matching and level of defences exhibited by its reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus hosts across seven geographically distant populations in Europe. We also explored the influence of spring climatic conditions experienced by cuckoos and hosts on cuckoo-host egg matching. We found that between-population differences in host defences against cuckoos (i.e. rejection rate) covaried with between-population differences in degree of matching. Between-population differences in host egg phenotype were associated with between-population differences in parasitism rate and spring climatic conditions, but not with host level of defences. Between-population differences in cuckoo egg phenotype covaried with between-population differences in host defences and spring climatic conditions. However, differences in host defences still explained differences in mimicry once differences in climatic conditions were controlled, suggesting that selection exerted by host defences must be strong relative to selection imposed by climatic factors on egg phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237911      PMCID: PMC3311906          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  40 in total

1.  When is correlation coevolution?

Authors:  Scott L Nuismer; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Benjamin J Ridenhour
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  A quantitative trait locus for recognition of foreign eggs in the host of a brood parasite.

Authors:  D Martín-Gálvez; J J Soler; J G Martínez; A P Krupa; M Richard; M Soler; A P Møller; T Burke
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 3.  Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution.

Authors:  R Gomulkiewicz; D M Drown; M F Dybdahl; W Godsoe; S L Nuismer; K M Pepin; B J Ridenhour; C I Smith; J B Yoder
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data.

Authors:  Pierre Legendre; Marie-Josée Fortin
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  The importance of clutch characteristics and learning for antiparasite adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites.

Authors:  Bård G Stokke; Fugo Takasu; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints.

Authors:  Oliver Krüger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Climate change effects on migration phenology may mismatch brood parasitic cuckoos and their hosts.

Authors:  Nicola Saino; Diego Rubolini; Esa Lehikoinen; Leonid V Sokolov; Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati; Roberto Ambrosini; Giuseppe Boncoraglio; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects.

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; John S Terblanche; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Marcel Honza; Tomas Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Sexually selected egg coloration in spotless starlings.

Authors:  Juan J Soler; Carlos Navarro; Tomás Pérez Contreras; Jesús M Avilés; José J Cuervo
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.