Literature DB >> 17767591

The importance of clutch characteristics and learning for antiparasite adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites.

Bård G Stokke1, Fugo Takasu, Arne Moksnes, Eivin Røskaft.   

Abstract

There is considerable variation in rejection rates of parasitic eggs among hosts of avian brood parasites. In this article, we develop a model that can be used to predict host egg rejection behavior in brood parasite-host systems in general, by considering both intra- and interclutch variation in host egg appearance; clutch characteristics that may be important in calculating the fitness of individuals adopting rejecter or acceptor strategies. In addition, we consider the importance of learning the appearance of own eggs during the first breeding attempt and host probability of survival between breeding seasons on evolution of rejection behavior. Based on this model we can predict at which level of parasitism fitness of rejecter individuals is higher than that of acceptor individuals and vice versa. The model analyses show that variation in egg appearance can be a key factor for the evolution of host defense against parasitism. In more detail, analyses show that we should expect to find a prolonged learning period only in hosts that have a high intraclutch variation in egg appearance, because such hosts may potentially experience high costs in terms of recognition errors. Furthermore, learning is in general more adaptive in parasite-host systems in which hosts do have some reproductive success even when parasitized, and when parasitism rates are moderate. By including variables that have not been considered in previous models, our model represents a useful tool in investigations of host rejection behavior in various host-parasite systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17767591     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00176.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

Review 1.  Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Host genotype and age have no effect on rejection of parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Petr Procházka; Hana Konvičková-Patzenhauerová; Milica Požgayová; Alfréd Trnka; Václav Jelínek; Marcel Honza
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-04-10

3.  Egg phenotype matching by cuckoos in relation to discrimination by hosts and climatic conditions.

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés; Johan R Vikan; Frode Fossøy; Anton Antonov; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Jacqui A Shykoff; Anders P Møller; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rearing a virulent common cuckoo is not extra costly for its only cavity-nesting host.

Authors:  Peter Samaš; Jarkko Rutila; Marcel Honza; Michal Kysučan; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Yan Cai; Suhua Shi; Fugo Takasu; Anders P Møller; Anton Antonov; Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Outcomes of brood parasite-host interactions mediated by egg matching: common cuckoos Cuculus canorus versus Fringilla finches.

Authors:  Johan Reinert Vikan; Frode Fossøy; Esa Huhta; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård Gunnar Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are cuckoos maximizing egg mimicry by selecting host individuals with better matching egg phenotypes?

Authors:  Anton Antonov; Bård G Stokke; Frode Fossøy; Peter S Ranke; Wei Liang; Canchao Yang; Arne Moksnes; Jacqui Shykoff; Eivin Røskaft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Naïve hosts of avian brood parasites accept foreign eggs, whereas older hosts fine-tune foreign egg discrimination during laying.

Authors:  Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán; Márk E Hauber
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  How can distinct egg polymorphism be maintained in the rufescent prinia (Prinia rufescens)-plaintive cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) interaction-a modeling approach.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Canchao Yang; Fugo Takasu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.