Literature DB >> 17344805

Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution.

R Gomulkiewicz1, D M Drown, M F Dybdahl, W Godsoe, S L Nuismer, K M Pepin, B J Ridenhour, C I Smith, J B Yoder.   

Abstract

The geographic mosaic theory of coevolution is stimulating much new research on interspecific interactions. We provide a guide to the fundamental components of the theory, its processes and main predictions. Our primary objectives are to clarify misconceptions regarding the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution and to describe how empiricists can test the theory rigorously. In particular, we explain why confirming the three main predicted empirical patterns (spatial variation in traits mediating interactions among species, trait mismatching among interacting species and few species-level coevolved traits) does not provide unequivocal support for the theory. We suggest that strong empirical tests of the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution should focus on its underlying processes: coevolutionary hot and cold spots, selection mosaics and trait remixing. We describe these processes and discuss potential ways each can be tested.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17344805     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  28 in total

1.  Expression Differentiation Is Constrained to Low-Expression Proteins over Ecological Timescales.

Authors:  Mark J Margres; Kenneth P Wray; Margaret Seavy; James J McGivern; Nathanael D Herrera; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Resistance in the plant, Barbarea vulgaris, and counter-adaptations in flea beetles mediated by saponins.

Authors:  Jens K Nielsen; Tsuneatsu Nagao; Hikaru Okabe; Tetsuro Shinoda
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Genetic structure and local adaptation of European wheat yellow rust populations: the role of temperature-specific adaptation.

Authors:  Mamadou Mboup; Bochra Bahri; Marc Leconte; Claude De Vallavieille-Pope; Oliver Kaltz; Jérôme Enjalbert
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Coevolution between invasive and native plants driven by chemical competition and soil biota.

Authors:  Richard A Lankau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Collective defence portfolios of ant hosts shift with social parasite pressure.

Authors:  Evelien Jongepier; Isabelle Kleeberg; Sylwester Job; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Coevolution of venom function and venom resistance in a rattlesnake predator and its squirrel prey.

Authors:  Matthew L Holding; James E Biardi; H Lisle Gibbs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Contrasting modes and tempos of venom expression evolution in two snake species.

Authors:  Mark J Margres; James J McGivern; Margaret Seavy; Kenneth P Wray; Jack Facente; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Temporal variation in temperature determines disease spread and maintenance in Paramecium microcosm populations.

Authors:  Alison B Duncan; Simon Fellous; Oliver Kaltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Geographic variation in the damselfish-red alga cultivation mutualism in the Indo-West Pacific.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Katsutoshi Watanabe; Makoto Kato
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Natural selection drives the fine-scale divergence of a coevolutionary arms race involving a long-mouthed weevil and its obligate host plant.

Authors:  Hirokazu Toju
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.