Literature DB >> 22237731

Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality.

R F de Wilde1, M G H Besselink, I van der Tweel, I H J T de Hingh, C H J van Eijck, C H C Dejong, R J Porte, D J Gouma, O R C Busch, I Q Molenaar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) on mortality is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse changes in hospital volumes and in-hospital mortality after PD in the Netherlands between 2004 and 2009.
METHODS: Nationwide data on International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9) code 5-526 (PD, including Whipple), patient age, sex and mortality were retrieved from the independent nationwide KiwaPrismant registry. Based on established cut-off points of annually performed PDs, hospitals were categorized as very low (fewer than 5), low (5-10), medium (11-19) or high (at least 20) volume. A subgroup analysis based on a cut-off age of 70 years was also performed.
RESULTS: Some 2155 PDs were included. The number of hospitals performing PD decreased from 48 in 2004 to 30 in 2009 (P = 0·011). In these specific years, the proportion of patients undergoing PD in a medium- or high-volume centre increased from 52·9 to 91·2 per cent (P < 0·001). Nationwide mortality rates after PD decreased from 9·8 to 5·1 per cent (P = 0·044). The mortality rate during the 6-year period was 14·7, 9·8, 6·3 and 3·3 per cent in very low-, low-, medium- and high-volume hospitals respectively (P < 0·001). The difference in mortality between medium- and high-volume centres was statistically significant (P = 0·004). The volume-outcome relationship was not influenced by age (P = 0·467). The mortality rate after PD in patients aged at least 70 years was 10·4 per cent compared with 4·4 per cent in younger patients (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION: With nationwide centralization of PD, the in-hospital mortality rate after this procedure decreased. Further centralization of PD is likely to decrease mortality further, especially in the elderly.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237731     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  89 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: changing the management of ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  Brandon C Chapman; Ana Gleisner; Irada Ibrahim-Zada; Douglas M Overbey; Alessandro Paniccia; Cheryl Meguid; Brian Brauer; Csaba Gajdos; Martin D McCarter; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Liver transplant patients have a risk of progression similar to that of sporadic patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lennon; David Victor; Atif Zaheer; Mohammad Reza Ostovaneh; Jessica Jeh; Joanna K Law; Neda Rezaee; Marco Dal Molin; Young Joon Ahn; Wenchuan Wu; Mouen A Khashab; Mohit Girotra; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Kenzo Hirose; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Andrew Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Vikesh K Singh; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes in a low-volume, specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary unit.

Authors:  H A Kanhere; M I Trochsler; M H Kanhere; A N Lord; G J Maddern
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Haane; Wolf Arif Mardin; Britta Schmitz; Sameer Dhayat; Richard Hummel; Norbert Senninger; Christina Schleicher; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections.

Authors:  Odo Gangl; Klaus Sahora; Peter Kornprat; Christian Margreiter; Florian Primavesi; Evelyne Bareck; Martin Schindl; Friedrich Längle; Dietmar Öfner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Johann Pratschke; Michael Gnant; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hartwig Bauer; Kim C Honselmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

8.  Role of a multidisciplinary clinic in the management of patients with pancreatic cysts: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lennon; Lindsey L Manos; Ralph H Hruban; Syed Z Ali; Elliot K Fishman; Ihab R Kamel; Siva P Raman; Atif Zaheer; Susan Hutfless; Ashley Salamone; Vandhana Kiswani; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Kenzo Hirose; Michael Goggins; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK.

Authors:  Sue Ziebland; Alison Chapple; Julie Evans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Is tumour size an underestimated feature in the current TNM system for malignancies of the pancreatic head?

Authors:  David Petermann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.