Literature DB >> 22235529

Understanding the effect of workload on automation use for younger and older adults.

Sara E McBride1, Wendy A Rogers, Arthur D Fisk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined how individuals, younger and older, interacted with an imperfect automated system. The impact of workload on performance and automation use was also investigated.
BACKGROUND: Automation is used in situations characterized by varying levels of workload. As automated systems spread to domains such as transportation and the home, a diverse population of users will interact with automation. Research is needed to understand how different segments of the population use automation.
METHOD: Workload was systematically manipulated to create three levels (low, moderate, high) in a dual-task scenario in which participants interacted with a 70% reliable automated aid. Two experiments were conducted to assess automation use for younger and older adults.
RESULTS: Both younger and older adults relied on the automation more than they complied with it. Among younger adults, high workload led to poorer performance and higher compliance, even when that compliance was detrimental. Older adults' performance was negatively affected by workload, but their compliance and reliance were unaffected.
CONCLUSION: Younger and older adults were both able to use and double-check an imperfect automated system. Workload affected how younger adults complied with automation, particularly with regard to detecting automation false alarms. Older adults tended to comply and rely at fairly high rates overall, and this did not change with increased workload. APPLICATION: Training programs for imperfect automated systems should vary workload and provide feedback about error types, and strategies for identifying errors. The ability to identify automation errors varies across individuals, thereby necessitating training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22235529      PMCID: PMC5816343          DOI: 10.1177/0018720811421909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  5 in total

1.  Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings.

Authors:  J Meyer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis.

Authors:  Stephen R Dixon; Christopher D Wickens; Dervon Chang
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload.

Authors:  Stephen R Dixon; Christopher D Wickens
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?

Authors:  Stephen R Dixon; Christopher D Wickens; Jason S McCarley
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.

Authors:  Poornima Madhavan; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.888

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Understanding human management of automation errors.

Authors:  Sara E McBride; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  Theor Issues Ergon Sci       Date:  2014

2.  Attitudes Toward Computers Across Adulthood From 1994 to 2013.

Authors:  Chin Chin Lee; Sara J Czaja; Jerad H Moxley; Joseph Sharit; Walter R Boot; Neil Charness; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-01-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.