Literature DB >> 25383042

Understanding human management of automation errors.

Sara E McBride1, Wendy A Rogers1, Arthur D Fisk1.   

Abstract

Automation has the potential to aid humans with a diverse set of tasks and support overall system performance. Automated systems are not always reliable, and when automation errs, humans must engage in error management, which is the process of detecting, understanding, and correcting errors. However, this process of error management in the context of human-automation interaction is not well understood. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the variables that contribute to error management. We examined relevant research in human-automation interaction and human error to identify critical automation, person, task, and emergent variables. We propose a framework for management of automation errors to incorporate and build upon previous models. Further, our analysis highlights variables that may be addressed through design and training to positively influence error management. Additional efforts to understand the error management process will contribute to automation designed and implemented to support safe and effective system performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automation; error; error management; human-automation interaction; imperfect automation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25383042      PMCID: PMC4221095          DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2013.817625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Issues Ergon Sci        ISSN: 1463-922X


  29 in total

1.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation.

Authors:  R Parasuraman; T B Sheridan; C D Wickens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum       Date:  2000-05

2.  Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload.

Authors:  J P Bliss; M C Dunn
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.

Authors:  John D Lee; Katrina A See
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Using system-wide trust theory to make predictions about dependence on four diagnostic aids.

Authors:  Stephen Rice; Kasha Geels
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

5.  Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.

Authors:  Stephen Rice; Jason S McCarley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2011-06-27

6.  Automation bias and errors: are crews better than individuals?

Authors:  L J Skitka; K L Mosier; M Burdick; B Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int J Aviat Psychol       Date:  2000

7.  Understanding the effect of workload on automation use for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Sara E McBride; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.

Authors:  Ericka Rovira; Kathleen McGarry; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Automated fault-management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world.

Authors:  Bernd Lorenz; Francesco Di Nocera; Stefan Röttger; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2002-09

10.  Humans: still vital after all these years of automation.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Christopher D Wickens
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

View more
  1 in total

1.  Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Goodyear; Raja Parasuraman; Sergey Chernyak; Poornima Madhavan; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.