Literature DB >> 12002005

Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings.

J Meyer1.   

Abstract

The effects of a warning's validity and display characteristics on the responses to binary warnings were studied in a categorization task that resembled the control of a simulated production environment. Students performed a visual signal detection task and were aided by a binary warning indicator. Experimental conditions differed in the validity of the warning and its proximity to the judged stimulus. Participants' performance improved over the course of the experiment, and they partly adjusted their responses to the validity of the warnings but continued to respond to nonvalid warnings throughout the experiment. It was particularly difficult to ignore the nonvalid information when it was integrated with the continuous information. There was evidence for nonoptimal use of the information from the warning system, whether it was valid or not valid. The results indicate a possible distinction between two dimensions of users' trust in warning systems: compliance and reliance. Actual or potential implications of this research include improved warning design based on analysis of system and operator characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12002005     DOI: 10.1518/001872001775870395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  [Clinical efficiency and the influence of human factors on ear, nose, and throat navigation systems].

Authors:  G Strauss; K Koulechov; S Röttger; J Bahner; C Trantakis; M Hofer; W Korb; O Burgert; J Meixensberger; D Manzey; A Dietz; T Lüth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Understanding the effect of workload on automation use for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Sara E McBride; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy.

Authors:  Tobias Rieger; Lydia Heilmann; Dietrich Manzey
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Judging One's Own or Another Person's Responsibility in Interactions With Automation.

Authors:  Nir Douer; Joachim Meyer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 5.  From Trust in Automation to Decision Neuroscience: Applying Cognitive Neuroscience Methods to Understand and Improve Interaction Decisions Involved in Human Automation Interaction.

Authors:  Kim Drnec; Amar R Marathe; Jamie R Lukos; Jason S Metcalfe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Expertise, Automation and Trust in X-Ray Screening of Cabin Baggage.

Authors:  Alain Chavaillaz; Adrian Schwaninger; Stefan Michel; Juergen Sauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.