Literature DB >> 22232544

ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Sergio Dubner1, Angelo Auricchio, Jonathan S Steinberg, Panos Vardas, Peter Stone, Josep Brugada, Ryszard Piotrowicz, David L Hayes, Paulus Kirchhof, Günter Breithardt, Wojciech Zareba, Claudio Schuger, Mehmet K Aktas, Michal Chudzik, Suneet Mittal, Niraj Varma.   

Abstract

We are in the midst of a rapidly evolving era of technology-assisted medicine. The field of telemedicine provides the opportunity for highly individualized medical management in a way that has never been possible before. Evolving medical technologies using cardiac implantable devices (CIEDs) with capabilities for remote monitoring permit evaluation of multiple parameters of cardiovascular physiology and risk, including cardiac rhythm, device function, blood pressure values, the presence of myocardial ischaemia, and the degree of compensation of congestive heart failure. Cardiac risk, device status, and response to therapies can now be assessed with these electronic systems of detection and reporting. This document reflects the extensive experience from investigators and innovators around the world who are shaping the evolution of this rapidly expanding field, focusing in particular on implantable pacemakers (IPGs), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (both, with and without defibrillation properties), loop recorders, and haemodynamic monitoring devices. This document covers the basic methodologies, guidelines for their use, experience with existing applications, and the legal and reimbursement aspects associated with their use. To adequately cover this important emerging topic, the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology (ISHNE) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) combined their expertise in this field. We hope that the development of this field can contribute to improve care of our cardiovascular patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22232544     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  35 in total

1.  Remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Southeast Asian, single-centre pilot study.

Authors:  Paul Chun Yih Lim; Audry Shan Yin Lee; Kelvin Chi Ming Chua; Eric Tien Siang Lim; Daniel Thuan Tee Chong; Boon Yew Tan; Kah Leng Ho; Wee Siong Teo; Chi Keong Ching
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Impact of in-clinic follow-up visits in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: demographic and socioeconomic analysis of the TARIFF study population.

Authors:  Renato P Ricci; Alfredo Vicentini; Antonio D'Onofrio; Antonio Sagone; Antonio Vincenti; Luigi Padeletti; Loredana Morichelli; Antonio Fusco; Filippo Vecchione; Francesco Lo Presti; Alessandra Denaro; Annalisa Pollastrelli; Massimo Santini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  REmote SUpervision to Decrease HospitaLization RaTe. Unified and integrated platform for data collected from devices manufactured by different companies: Design and rationale of the RESULT study.

Authors:  Mateusz Tajstra; Adam Sokal; Arkadiusz Gwóźdź; Marcin Wilczek; Adam Gacek; Konrad Wojciechowski; Elżbieta Gadula-Gacek; Elżbieta Adamowicz-Czoch; Katarzyna Chłosta-Niepiekło; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Rozentryt; Zbigniew Kalarus; Mariusz Gąsior; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator remote monitoring is well accepted and easy to use during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Loredana Morichelli; Antonio Porfili; Laura Quarta; Anna Sassi; Renato Pietro Ricci
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Trials of implantable monitoring devices in heart failure: which design is optimal?

Authors:  William T Abraham; Wendy G Stough; Ileana L Piña; Cecilia Linde; Jeffrey S Borer; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Roxana Mehran; Kenneth M Stein; Alphons Vincent; Jay S Yadav; Stefan D Anker; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions.

Authors:  Ermenegildo de Ruvo; Luigi Sciarra; Anna Maria Martino; Marco Rebecchi; Renzo Venanzio Iulianella; Francesco Sebastiani; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alessio Borrelli; Antonio Scarà; Domenico Grieco; Claudia Tota; Federica Stirpe; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Home monitoring after ambulatory implanted primary cardiac implantable electronic devices: The home ambulance pilot study.

Authors:  Mariana S Parahuleva; Nedim Soydan; Dimitar Divchev; Ulrich Lüsebrink; Bernhard Schieffer; Ali Erdogan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  [Device-based remote monitoring : Current evidence].

Authors:  David Duncker; Roman Michalski; Johanna Müller-Leisse; Christos Zormpas; Thorben König; Christian Veltmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 9.  Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).

Authors:  Emily P Zeitler; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 10.  Mechanisms of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Mahek Mirza; Anton Strunets; Win-Kuang Shen; Arshad Jahangir
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.