Literature DB >> 22231485

Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development.

Stefan Bonn1, Robert P Zinzen, Charles Girardot, E Hilary Gustafson, Alexis Perez-Gonzalez, Nicolas Delhomme, Yad Ghavi-Helm, Bartek Wilczyński, Andrew Riddell, Eileen E M Furlong.   

Abstract

Chromatin modifications are associated with many aspects of gene expression, yet their role in cellular transitions during development remains elusive. Here, we use a new approach to obtain cell type-specific information on chromatin state and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy within the multicellular Drosophila melanogaster embryo. We directly assessed the relationship between chromatin modifications and the spatio-temporal activity of enhancers. Rather than having a unique chromatin state, active developmental enhancers show heterogeneous histone modifications and Pol II occupancy. Despite this complexity, combined chromatin signatures and Pol II presence are sufficient to predict enhancer activity de novo. Pol II recruitment is highly predictive of the timing of enhancer activity and seems dependent on the timing and location of transcription factor binding. Chromatin modifications typically demarcate large regulatory regions encompassing multiple enhancers, whereas local changes in nucleosome positioning and Pol II occupancy delineate single active enhancers. This cell type-specific view identifies dynamic enhancer usage, an essential step in deciphering developmental networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231485     DOI: 10.1038/ng.1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  70 in total

1.  Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Andreas Rechtsteiner; Thea A Egelhofer; Anne Vielle; Isabel Latorre; Ming-Sin Cheung; Sevinc Ercan; Kohta Ikegami; Morten Jensen; Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz; Heidi Rosenbaum; Hyunjin Shin; Scott Taing; Teruaki Takasaki; A Leonardo Iniguez; Arshad Desai; Abby F Dernburg; Hiroshi Kimura; Jason D Lieb; Julie Ahringer; Susan Strome; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  J Jiang; D Kosman; Y T Ip; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhibin Wang; Chongzhi Zang; Jeffrey A Rosenfeld; Dustin E Schones; Artem Barski; Suresh Cuddapah; Kairong Cui; Tae-Young Roh; Weiqun Peng; Michael Q Zhang; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression.

Authors:  Rosa Karlić; Ho-Ryun Chung; Julia Lasserre; Kristian Vlahovicek; Martin Vingron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Disperse versus compact elements for the regulation of runt stripes in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Klingler; J Soong; B Butler; J P Gergen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1996-07-10       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Chromatin signatures in multipotent human hematopoietic stem cells indicate the fate of bivalent genes during differentiation.

Authors:  Kairong Cui; Chongzhi Zang; Tae-Young Roh; Dustin E Schones; Richard W Childs; Weiqun Peng; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations.

Authors:  Susan Tweedie; Michael Ashburner; Kathleen Falls; Paul Leyland; Peter McQuilton; Steven Marygold; Gillian Millburn; David Osumi-Sutherland; Andrew Schroeder; Ruth Seal; Haiyan Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  ShortRead: a bioconductor package for input, quality assessment and exploration of high-throughput sequence data.

Authors:  Martin Morgan; Simon Anders; Michael Lawrence; Patrick Aboyoun; Hervé Pagès; Robert Gentleman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis.

Authors:  Pavel Tomancak; Benjamin P Berman; Amy Beaton; Richard Weiszmann; Elaine Kwan; Volker Hartenstein; Susan E Celniker; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  258 in total

1.  Cell type-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation from multicellular complex samples using BiTS-ChIP.

Authors:  Stefan Bonn; Robert P Zinzen; Alexis Perez-Gonzalez; Andrew Riddell; Anne-Claude Gavin; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Enhancers: emerging roles in cell fate specification.

Authors:  Chin-Tong Ong; Victor G Corces
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Transcription-Factor-Dependent Control of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis.

Authors:  Ruth Beckervordersandforth; Chun-Li Zhang; Dieter Chichung Lie
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Exploiting genomics and natural genetic variation to decode macrophage enhancers.

Authors:  Casey E Romanoski; Verena M Link; Sven Heinz; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 16.687

5.  NeuroD1 reprograms chromatin and transcription factor landscapes to induce the neuronal program.

Authors:  Abhijeet Pataskar; Johannes Jung; Pawel Smialowski; Florian Noack; Federico Calegari; Tobias Straub; Vijay K Tiwari
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Foxd3 Promotes Exit from Naive Pluripotency through Enhancer Decommissioning and Inhibits Germline Specification.

Authors:  Patricia Respuela; Miloš Nikolić; Minjia Tan; Peter Frommolt; Yingming Zhao; Joanna Wysocka; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  DNA methylation changes in plasticity genes accompany the formation and maintenance of memory.

Authors:  Rashi Halder; Magali Hennion; Ramon O Vidal; Orr Shomroni; Raza-Ur Rahman; Ashish Rajput; Tonatiuh Pena Centeno; Frauke van Bebber; Vincenzo Capece; Julio C Garcia Vizcaino; Anna-Lena Schuetz; Susanne Burkhardt; Eva Benito; Magdalena Navarro Sala; Sanaz Bahari Javan; Christian Haass; Bettina Schmid; Andre Fischer; Stefan Bonn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Architectural and Functional Commonalities between Enhancers and Promoters.

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Kim; Ramin Shiekhattar
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Trithorax monomethylates histone H3K4 and interacts directly with CBP to promote H3K27 acetylation and antagonize Polycomb silencing.

Authors:  Feng Tie; Rakhee Banerjee; Alina R Saiakhova; Benny Howard; Kelsey E Monteith; Peter C Scacheri; Michael S Cosgrove; Peter J Harte
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  CAST-ChIP maps cell-type-specific chromatin states in the Drosophila central nervous system.

Authors:  Tamás Schauer; Petra C Schwalie; Ava Handley; Carla E Margulies; Paul Flicek; Andreas G Ladurner
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.