Literature DB >> 22229389

Age, clutter, and competitive selection.

Jason S McCarley1, Yusuke Yamani, Arthur F Kramer, Jeffrey R W Mounts.   

Abstract

Modern theory explains visual selective attention as a competition for receptive fields in the extrastriate cortex. The present study examined whether this competition contributes to older adults' difficulty in processing visual clutter. In 2 experiments, young and older adult subjects made same-different judgments of target shapes in displays with or without clutter. The target shapes were either high or low in discriminability. The spatial separation between targets varied across trials, and the effects of competitive selection were gauged through decrements in task performance that resulted as separation decreased. Both age groups showed a competition-in-clutter effect, evincing a stronger influence of target separation within cluttered displays. However, the costs of clutter in general and the strength of the competition-in-clutter effect more specifically were both substantially larger for older adults. Effects of clutter and competition also varied with stimulus discriminability; judgments of highly discriminable stimuli evinced no intertarget competition in uncluttered displays for either age group, while judgments of less discriminable stimuli showed competition whether clutter was present or not. Results suggest that clutter disproportionately degrades older adults' visual performance by forcing more careful stimulus resolution, engendering stronger competition for selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22229389     DOI: 10.1037/a0026705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  9 in total

1.  Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Fergus I M Craik; Brian Levine; Sylvain Moreno; Gary Naglie; HeeSun Choi
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-10-11

2.  Improving Wayfinding for Older Users With Selective Attention Deficits.

Authors:  Ada D Mishler; Mark B Neider
Journal:  Ergon Des       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention.

Authors:  Emily L Twedell; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  External distraction impairs categorization performance in older adults.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-09

7.  Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

8.  Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Workspace Disorder Does Not Influence Creativity and Executive Functions.

Authors:  Alberto Manzi; Yana Durmysheva; Shannon K Pinegar; Andrew Rogers; Justine Ramos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.