| Literature DB >> 22228992 |
Ni Li1, Li-Hua Peng, Xi Chen, Shinsaku Nakagawa, Jian-Qing Gao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous vaccines have received wide attention due to their easy-to-use, needle-free, noninvasive delivery. However, the novel barrier function of stratum corneum hinders the transport of antigen and adjuvant in transcutaneous immunization. Novel nanoscale delivery systems employing, for example, liposomes and nanoparticles, have been widely investigated to overcome the penetration barrier of stratum corneum for effective transcutaneous immunization.Entities:
Keywords: adjuvant; flexible liposome; immunization enhancement; transcutaneous vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22228992 PMCID: PMC3252672 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S26152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Distribution of different NaFl formulations in the stratum corneum and viable skin
| Distribution | Solution | CLs (reverse) | CLs (film) | FLs (reverse) | FLs (film) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratum corneum | 7.62 ± 1.84 | 22.92 ± 0.87 | 17.53 ± 4.53 | 16.83 ± 3.15 | 8.81 ± 5.43 |
| Viable skin | 991.57 ± 43.67 | 1980.92 ± 661.19 | 628.03 ± 27.62 | 2894.59 ± 178.79 | 930.46 ± 356.25 |
Notes: All the formulations were applied by transcutaneous route in the pig skin (ng/cm2, mean ± SD, n = 3). The statistical significance of the differences between groups was investigated using Student’s t-test.
Versus solution group, P < 0.05;
versus solution group, P < 0.01. Solution: NaFl solution.
Abbreviations: CLs (reverse), common liposomes prepared by reverse-phase evaporation method; CLs (film), common liposomes prepared by film-dispersion method; FLs (reverse), flexible liposomes prepared by reverse-phase evaporation method; FLs (film), flexible liposomes prepared by film-dispersion method; NaFl, fluorescein sodium.
Figure 1Characteristics of the ovalbumin (OVA)-loaded liposome 1 and 2. (A) Particle sizes and zeta potentials; (B) size distribution of the liposomes as determined by Malvern Zetamaster ([i]: liposome 1; [ii] liposome 2). (C) Vesicle morphology of the liposomes under transmission electron microscopy ([i]: liposome 1; [ii] liposome 2). (D) Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel displaying the OVA encapsulated in liposome 1 and liposome 2 after loading process. Lane I: OVA standard; lane II: OVA loaded in liposome 1; lane III: OVA loaded in liposome 2.
Figure 2In vitro ovalbumin (OVA) release from the liposomes into phosphate-buffered saline (37°C). Liposome 1: prepared by film-dispersion method; liposome 2: prepared by reverse-evaporation method.
Figure 3Fluorescent scanning microscopy images of skin samples from mice in which fluorescent ovalbumin (OVA) flexible liposomes had been applied transcutaneously: (Ai–Ci and Aiii–Ciii) images under visible light; (Aii–Cii and Aiv–Civ) images under fluorescence. Group A: OVA-loaded liposomes (blank control); Group B: FITC-OVA-loaded liposome by reverse-evaporation method; Group C: FITC-OVA-loaded liposome by film-dispersion method.
Notes: (Ai–Cii) are shown at ×5 magnification; (Aiii–Civ) are shown at ×20 magnification.
Figure 4Anti-OVA IgG responses obtained with liposome formulations by transcutaneous immunization. (A) Liposome 1 (prepared by film-dispersion method) with or without adjuvant imiquimod transcutaneously. (B) Liposome 1 (prepared by film-dispersion method) applied on intact skin or stratum corneum pretreated skin transcutaneously, imiquimod as an adjuvant. (C) liposome 1 (prepared by film-dispersion method) and liposome 2 applied transcutaneously stratum corneum pretreated skin with the adjuvant imiquimod. (D) Liposome 1 (prepared by film-dispersion method) applied transcutaneously in the intact skin, with the adjuvant imiquimod; injection represents the OVA solution subcutaneously injected as a positive control.
Notes: Bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Statistical significance was evaluated by one-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: OVA, ovalbumin; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ANOVA, analysis of variance.