Literature DB >> 22228160

Defunctioning loop ileostomy for pelvic anastomoses: predictors of morbidity and nonclosure.

Linda J Chun1, Philip I Haigh, Michael S Tam, Maher A Abbas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity of a defunctioning loop ileostomy and the subsequent closure rate, and to identify the predictors of complications and nonclosure of stoma.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of a single-institution experience. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a planned temporary defunctioning loop ileostomy performed synchronously with a pelvic anastomosis during a 6-year period were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the ileostomy complication rate for the entire spectrum of care, readmission and reoperation rates to treat ileostomy complications, and subsequent closure rate. Patient and treatment factors were evaluated for their independent effect on complications and closure rate with the use of multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were identified (median age, 51 years). Of these patients, 64.2% developed ≥1 minor or major ileostomy complications (13.8% during index hospitalization, 52.8% as outpatient, and 23.4% after closure). Readmitted for dehydration following ileostomy formation were 11.4% of patients. The ileostomy was closed in 76.4% of patients with 8.6% requiring a midline laparotomy. The overall ileostomy-related reoperation rate was 10.4% (2.4% during index hospitalization, 1.6% at readmission, and 6.4% following ileostomy closure). Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m) was associated with a higher overall ileostomy complication rate (OR 8.56, 95% CI 1.64-44.74) and outpatient complication rate (OR 7.69, 95% CI 2.48-23.81). Age >65 years (OR 53.34, 95% CI 4.21-676.14) and hypertension (OR 8.36, 95% CI 1.09-64.43) increased the risks of high ileostomy output and dehydration. Obesity (OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.14-18.54) and smoking (4.47, 95% CI 1.43-13.98) decreased the likelihood of ileostomy closure. LIMITATION: This study was limited by its retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity of a defunctioning loop ileostomy remains significant. Obesity is an independent predictor of ileostomy complications. Older age and hypertension increase the risks of high-output stoma and dehydration. Almost one quarter of patients never have the ileostomy closed. Obesity and smoking are associated with less likelihood of a subsequent ileostomy closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228160     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823a9761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  31 in total

1.  The use of a T drain tube to treat anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Y Rudnicki; B Shpitz; I White; Y Wiener; G Golani; S Avital
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sohyun Kim; Sang Hun Jung; Jae Hwang Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Current evidence regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Styliani Vederaki; Georgios Koukoulis; Dimitrios Symeonidis; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Intestinal Stomas-Postoperative Stoma Care and Peristomal Skin Complications.

Authors:  Emily Steinhagen; Janice Colwell; Lisa M Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

7.  Identification of process measures to reduce postoperative readmission.

Authors:  Amy L Halverson; Morgan M Sellers; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mary T Hawn; Mark V Williams; Robin S McLeod; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Tamura; Kenji Matsuda; Shozo Yokoyama; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yuki Mizumoto; Daisuke Murakami; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Hun Jin Kim; Chang Hyun Kim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Is Diversion with Ileostomy Non-inferior to Hartmann Resection for Left-sided Colorectal Anastomotic Leak?

Authors:  Caitlin Stafford; Todd D Francone; Peter W Marcello; Patricia L Roberts; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.