Literature DB >> 22227916

The effects of an unexpected spider stimulus on skin conductance responses and eye movements: an inattentional blindness study.

Julian Wiemer1, Antje B M Gerdes, Paul Pauli.   

Abstract

Are spiders evolutionarily relevant threat cues that capture attention automatically and preattentively-also in non-fearful persons? Previous studies concerning this question did not examine responses to unexpected spider stimuli, although this is an ecologically valid situation. Therefore, we conducted an inattentional blindness (IB) experiment. While unselected participants (N = 120) were focusing their attention on a visual discrimination task, suddenly a spider or a flower image appeared. The rates of reported detection were not enhanced for spider images, and fear of spiders had no moderating influence on IB rates. However, spider pictures in general elicited greater skin conductance responses than flower pictures, and this difference was also observed for pictures that were not reported afterward. Moreover, eye movement data revealed that the spider stimulus was initially fixated more often than the flower stimulus. In sum, our findings imply that enhanced reactions to unexpected spider images are independent of fear level and include early engagement processes. Awareness of a spider picture does not seem to be a prerequisite for elevated arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22227916     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0407-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  46 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Interstimulus intervals for skin conductance response measurement.

Authors:  Assaf Breska; Keren Maoz; Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Fear and the amygdala: manipulation of awareness generates differential cerebral responses to phobic and fear-relevant (but nonfeared) stimuli.

Authors:  Katrina Carlsson; Karl Magnus Petersson; Daniel Lundqvist; Andreas Karlsson; Martin Ingvar; Arne Ohman
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-12

4.  Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  Guillermo Recio; Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews; P Tata
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

6.  Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.

Authors:  J Yiend; A Mathews
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

7.  The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Leah K Pischek-Simpson; Mark J Boschen; David L Neumann; Allison M Waters
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-01-24

8.  Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  C Büchel; J Morris; R J Dolan; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  On the unconscious subcortical origin of human fear.

Authors:  Arne Ohman; Katrina Carlsson; Daniel Lundqvist; Martin Ingvar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-05-25

10.  Neural, electrodermal and behavioral response patterns in contingency aware and unaware subjects during a picture-picture conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  T Klucken; S Kagerer; J Schweckendiek; K Tabbert; D Vaitl; R Stark
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  6 in total

1.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task.

Authors:  Guadalupe Guerrero; Dustin P Calvillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

3.  Threat-relevant stimuli cannot be better detected by preschoolers in an inattentional blindness task.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Jiale Wang; Yan Liu; Congcong Yan; Xiaohong Ye
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

5.  Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

6.  Threat vs. Threat: Attention to Fear-Related Animals and Threatening Faces.

Authors:  Elisa Berdica; Antje B M Gerdes; Florian Bublatzky; Andrew J White; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.