Literature DB >> 11548029

Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.

J Yiend1, A Mathews.   

Abstract

Previous research using attentional search tasks has revealed an anxiety-related bias favouring attention to threatening words when they are presented simultaneously with emotionally neutral words. In Experiment 1, using a similar task, a related effect was found here with emotionally threatening pictures. When pictures were used as location cues in a second experiment, high-trait anxious individuals were slower than less anxious controls when responding to targets requiring attentional disengagement from threat, and they were slower in general with pictures judged to be highly threatening. In a third experiment using the same task but with a longer cue exposure, a related disengagement difficulty occurred across both groups, although the more general slowing with severe threat was again confined to the anxious group. We conclude that attentional bias involves both a specific difficulty in disengaging attention from the location of any threat and a more general interference effect that is related to threat level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11548029     DOI: 10.1080/713755991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  75 in total

1.  Evidence from the eyes: Threatening postures hold attention.

Authors:  Bobby Azarian; Elizabeth G Esser; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.

Authors:  Neil R Harrison; Rob Woodhouse
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  Faces retain attention.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Ignace T C Hooge; Rob Jenkins; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

4.  Mental rubbernecking to negative information depends on task context.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Joseph T McGuire; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

5.  Does contingency awareness mediate the influence of emotional learning on the cueing of visual attention?

Authors:  An K Raes; Rudi De Raedt; Wim Fias; Ernst H W Koster; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-06

6.  More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Ingrid Scharlau; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

7.  Neural response during attentional control and emotion processing predicts improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  H Klumpp; D A Fitzgerald; M Angstadt; D Post; K L Phan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 8.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  Emotional attention: effects of emotion and gaze direction on overt orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Paola Bonifacci; Paola Ricciardelli; Luisa Lugli; Antonello Pellicano
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-11-07

10.  Trait anxiety and conflict monitoring following threat: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis; Chao-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.