Literature DB >> 22223184

How noise in force fields can affect the structural refinement of protein models?

Pawel Gniewek1, Andrzej Kolinski, Robert L Jernigan, Andrzej Kloczkowski.   

Abstract

Structural refinement of predicted models of biological macromolecules using atomistic or coarse-grained molecular force fields having various degree of error is investigated. The goal of this analysis is to estimate what is the probability for designing an effective structural refinement based on computations of conformational energies using force field, and starting from a structure predicted from the sequence (using template-based or template-free modeling), and refining it to bring the structure into closer proximity to the native state. It is widely believed that it should be possible to develop such a successful structure refinement algorithm by applying an iterative procedure with stochastic sampling and appropriate energy function, which assesses the quality (correctness) of protein decoys. Here, an analysis of noise in an artificially introduced scoring function is investigated for a model of an ideal sampling scheme, where the underlying distribution of RMSDs is assumed to be Gaussian. Sampling of the conformational space is performed by random generation of RMSD values. We demonstrate that whenever the random noise in a force field exceeds some level, it is impossible to obtain reliable structural refinement. The magnitude of the noise, above which a structural refinement, on average is impossible, depends strongly on the quality of sampling scheme and a size of the protein. Finally, possible strategies to overcome the intrinsic limitations in the force fields for impacting the development of successful refinement algorithms are discussed.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  force field; knowledge-based potentials; normal modes analysis; protein structure prediction; protein structure refinement; white noise

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22223184      PMCID: PMC3326201          DOI: 10.1002/prot.23240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  20 in total

1.  Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-02

2.  Modeling of loops in protein structures.

Authors:  A Fiser; R K Do; A Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Dylan Chivian; Jens Meiler; Kira M S Misura; Carol A Rohl; William R Schief; William J Wedemeyer; Ora Schueler-Furman; Paul Murphy; Jack Schonbrun; Charles E M Strauss; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

4.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Adam Zemla; Tim Hubbard
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation.

Authors:  Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  Acta Biochim Pol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.149

6.  Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo calbindin D9K.

Authors:  J Lee; A Liwo; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model.

Authors:  A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-09-01

9.  What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with an rmsd of 6 A?

Authors:  B A Reva; A V Finkelstein; J Skolnick
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1998

10.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Elastic network normal modes provide a basis for protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Pawel Gniewek; Andrzej Kolinski; Robert L Jernigan; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Time-averaged order parameter restraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Fabian Heller; Nathan Schmid; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Christopher G Myers; Lauren Beljak; Justin Chen; Sami Dakhel; Daniel Darling; Sayak Ghosh; Joseph Hall; Mikaeel Jan; Emily Liang; Sera Saju; Mackenzie Vohr; Chris Wu; Yifan Xu; Eva Xue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Prediction of Protein Tertiary Structure via Regularized Template Classification Techniques.

Authors:  Óscar Álvarez-Machancoses; Juan Luis Fernández-Martínez; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.