Literature DB >> 22223077

Double dissociation of working memory load effects induced by bilateral parietal modulation.

Marco Sandrini1, Anna Fertonani, Leonardo G Cohen, Carlo Miniussi.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroimaging data have revealed bilateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC) involvement during verbal n-back working memory (WM). In this task as n (i.e., WM load) increases, subjects show poorer behavioral performance as well as greater activation of this brain area. Moreover, there is evidence that a brief period of practice or even increased familiarity with the task can improve WM performance and lead to activation changes in the PPC. The aim of this study was to investigate, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), the effects on WM load performance induced by different PPC modulation after increased familiarity with the task. After a short practice, we tested verbal WM using an n-back task (1-back vs. 2-back) before and after the application of bilateral tDCS over PPCs (left anodal-right cathodal, left cathodal-right anodal or sham). ANOVA showed a significant interaction between tDCS and task. In the 1-back task, left anodal-right cathodal modulation abolished improvement in reaction times observed in the other two modulation conditions. Conversely, in the 2-back task the same effect was observed after left cathodal-right anodal modulation relative to the other two modulation conditions. This double dissociation demonstrates either a differential engagement of each PPC or changes in the interhemispheric balance of activity across this brain region. Neuroimaging studies show parametric activation of the PPC as difficulty increases, but activation does not switch sides. Thus, our observed effects cannot be attributed to increased task difficulty, the stimuli used, or the response requirements. Rather, we suggest that these findings reflect the use of different processing strategies to perform these two tasks. In conclusion, after increased familiarity with the task, different tDCS modulations lead to changes in a task-related region depending on differences in processing strategies in 1-back vs. 2-back.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22223077      PMCID: PMC4880015          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  82 in total

1.  Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task.

Authors:  B R Postle; J S Berger; J H Goldstein; C E Curtis; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study.

Authors:  D Keeser; F Padberg; E Reisinger; O Pogarell; V Kirsch; U Palm; S Karch; H-J Möller; M A Nitsche; C Mulert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Rafael Polania; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Anusha Venkatakrishnan; Marco Sandrini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A positron emission tomography study of the short-term maintenance of verbal information.

Authors:  J A Fiez; E A Raife; D A Balota; J P Schwarz; M E Raichle; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  G D Honey; C H Y Fu; J Kim; M J Brammer; T J Croudace; J Suckling; E M Pich; S C R Williams; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on episodic memory related to emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Barbara Penolazzi; Alberto Di Domenico; Daniele Marzoli; Nicola Mammarella; Beth Fairfield; Raffaella Franciotti; Alfredo Brancucci; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Koenigs; Aron K Barbey; Bradley R Postle; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  Csaba Poreisz; Klára Boros; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  18 in total

1.  Chronic Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Intracortical Recording in Rats.

Authors:  Gábor Kozák; Tamás Földi; Antal Berényi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Learning and memory.

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Kathy Ran; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

3.  Resting state signatures of domain and demand-specific working memory performance.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Scott L Decker; Jeffery S Durbin; Jennifer M C Vendemia; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  About the Distinction between Working Memory and Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Bart Aben; Sven Stapert; Arjan Blokland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-23

5.  Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Separating recognition processes of declarative memory via anodal tDCS: boosting old item recognition by temporal and new item detection by parietal stimulation.

Authors:  Alberto Pisoni; Zsolt Turi; Almuth Raithel; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Ivan Alekseichuk; Annekathrin Schacht; Walter Paulus; Andrea Antal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning, memory, and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joaquim P Brasil-Neto
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training.

Authors:  Beatrix Krause; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills.

Authors:  Jessica W Younger; Melissa Randazzo Wagner; James R Booth
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.