Literature DB >> 22222194

Which patients pursue fertility preservation treatments? A multicenter analysis of the predictors of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer.

Jayeon Kim1, Kutluk Oktay, Clarisa Gracia, Sanghoon Lee, Christopher Morse, Jennifer E Mersereau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of undergoing fertility preservation treatment (FPT) in women with breast cancer.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a clinical database.
SETTING: Three academic fertility preservation centers. PATIENT(S): One hundred eight patients with breast cancer undergoing FPT and 77 patients with breast cancer not undergoing FPT from 2005 to 2010. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patients' demographic and medical information. RESULT(S): Women who had FPT were older, wealthier, and had lower cancer stage compared with women who did not have FPT. The rate of the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was significantly lower in women who underwent FPT. After adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), income, cancer stage, and center, a negative correlation persisted between NAC and FPT (odds ratio 0.091, 95% confidence interval 0.009-0.904). When we stratified the women by center, women at center 1 had a significantly lower FPT rate, lower parity, higher BMI, more advanced cancer stage, and lower income compared with centers 2 and 3. The rates of NAC were significantly higher in center 1. CONCLUSION(S): Although age, BMI, income, cancer stage, center, and NAC seem to be associated with undergoing FPT, NAC is the only modifiable variable. Because NAC restricts the time available for FPT, oncologists may consider offering adjuvant chemotherapy, except in cases in which NAC clearly improves survival, in women who are interested in FPT.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222194      PMCID: PMC4191895          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  26 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: multidisciplinary considerations of benefits and risks.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Kelly K Hunt; Gary J Whitman; Aysegul A Sahin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Makris; T J Powles; S E Ashley; J Chang; T Hickish; V A Tidy; A G Nash; H T Ford
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Race, anthropometric factors, and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Moorman; B A Jones; R C Millikan; I J Hall; B Newman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Aaron Charlop; Thomas J Lawton; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Robert B Livingston
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Fertility preservation: a pilot study to assess previsit patient knowledge quantitatively.

Authors:  Ursula Balthazar; Marc A Fritz; Jennifer E Mersereau
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Physicians' attitudes and preventive care delivery: insights from the DOPC study.

Authors:  David Litaker; Susan A Flocke; Joseph P Frolkis; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  The fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of breast cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Judy Rickard; Michael Friedlander
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Bryant; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; A Brown; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; A DeCillis; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov; H D Bear
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer.

Authors:  R L Street; B Voigt; C Geyer; T Manning; G P Swanson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  31 in total

1.  Prospective study of depression and anxiety in female fertility preservation and infertility patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Factors associated with pregnancy attempts among female young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sally A Dominick; Brian W Whitcomb; Jessica R Gorman; Jennifer E Mersereau; Karine Chung; H Irene Su
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Shari I Gelber; Rulla M Tamimi; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Meghan E Meyer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

5.  Is Fertility Preservation Feasible and Safe With Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Avner Hershlag; Christine Mullin; Sara L Bristow
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-09

6.  Management of Potential Long-Term Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C O'Sullivan; K J Ruddy
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  Long-Term Safety of Letrozole and Gonadotropin Stimulation for Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jayeon Kim; Volkan Turan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  A pilot study of BRCA mutation carriers' knowledge about the clinical impact of prophylactic-oophorectomy and views on fertility consultation: a single-center pilot study.

Authors:  J Kim; C Skrzynia; J E Mersereau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Toward theoretical understanding of the fertility preservation decision-making process: examining information processing among young women with cancer.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Lorna Finnegan; Susan Altfeld; Sara Lake; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Oncofertility: Meeting the Fertility Goals of Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  H Irene Su; Yuton Tony Lee; Ronald Barr
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.