Literature DB >> 8635032

Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer.

R L Street1, B Voigt, C Geyer, T Manning, G P Swanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This investigation examined factors affecting patient involvement in consultations to decide local treatment for early breast cancer and the effectiveness of two methods of preconsultation education aimed at increasing patient participation in these discussions.
METHODS: Sixty patients with Stage I or II breast cancer (1) were pretested on their knowledge about breast cancer treatment and optimism for the future, (2) were randomly assigned to one of two methods for preconsultation education: interactive multimedia program or brochure, (3) completed knowledge and optimism measures, (4) consulted with a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and general surgeon, and (5) completed self-report measures assessing their involvement in the consultations and control over decision-making. The consultations were audiorecorded and analyzed to identify behavioral indicators of patient involvement (question-asking, opinion-giving, and expressing concern) and physician utterances encouraging patient participation.
RESULTS: College-educated patients younger than 65 years of age were more active participants in these consultations than were older, less educated patients. In addition, patients showed more involvement when they interacted with physicians who encouraged and facilitated patient participation. The method of education did not affect patient involvement although patients tended to learn more about breast cancer treatment after using the multimedia program than after reading the brochure.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients vary in their expressiveness, physicians may be able to increase patient participation in deciding treatment by using patient-centered behavior. Also, preconsultation education appears to be an effective clinical strategy for helping patients gain an accurate understanding of their treatment options before meeting with physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8635032     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2275::aid-cncr2820761115>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  82 in total

1.  Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.

Authors:  A J Sowden; C Forbes; V Entwistle; I Watt
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

Review 5.  Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Ratté; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Improving osteoporosis care in high-risk home health patients through a high-intensity intervention.

Authors:  Ryan C Outman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Julie L Locher; Jeroan J Allison; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 7.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Assessment of the use and feasibility of video to supplement the genetic counseling process: a cancer genetic counseling perspective.

Authors:  J E Axilbund; L A Hamby; D B Thompson; S J Olsen; C A Griffin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Monique Heijmans; Jany Rademakers; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Christina Slee; Donna K Kalauokalani; Dionne Evans Dean; Daniel J Tancredi; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.