Tracy Barbour1, Patrick Pruitt, Vaibhav A Diwadkar. 1. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fronto-limbic regions of the brain including the sub-genual (sgPFC) and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortices are central to processing emotionally salient and hedonic stimuli (Mayberg, 2009) and implicated in depression. The relevance of cortico-limbic models of emotion and reward processing in children with genetic risk for psychiatric disorders has not been assessed. METHODS: Here we studied adolescents at risk for schizophrenia (HRS) and controls (HC) using an event-related fMRI continuous affective appraisal task. HRS were divided into sub-groups based on the presence or absence of negative symptoms (Miller et al., 2003), HRS_NS+ and HRS_NS- respectively. Brain responses to positive, negative and neutral emotional stimuli were estimated. RESULTS: Consistent with observations in the depressive phenotype, for positively valenced stimuli, HRS_NS+ (relative to HC and HRS_NS-) were characterized by hypo-responsivity of the sgPFC and the mPFC, but hyper-responsivity of the mid-brain. sgPFC and mPFC signals were coupled across groups. LIMITATIONS: Such studies can benefit from larger sample sizes, though our observed effect sizes were in the moderate to large range. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents at risk for psychiatric illness and who evince reliably present negative symptoms show brain responses to socially rewarding stimuli similar to those observed in depression. Studies in at-risk children and adolescents may be important in understanding how early manifestations of depression-like characteristics impact brain function.
BACKGROUND: Fronto-limbic regions of the brain including the sub-genual (sgPFC) and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortices are central to processing emotionally salient and hedonic stimuli (Mayberg, 2009) and implicated in depression. The relevance of cortico-limbic models of emotion and reward processing in children with genetic risk for psychiatric disorders has not been assessed. METHODS: Here we studied adolescents at risk for schizophrenia (HRS) and controls (HC) using an event-related fMRI continuous affective appraisal task. HRS were divided into sub-groups based on the presence or absence of negative symptoms (Miller et al., 2003), HRS_NS+ and HRS_NS- respectively. Brain responses to positive, negative and neutral emotional stimuli were estimated. RESULTS: Consistent with observations in the depressive phenotype, for positively valenced stimuli, HRS_NS+ (relative to HC and HRS_NS-) were characterized by hypo-responsivity of the sgPFC and the mPFC, but hyper-responsivity of the mid-brain. sgPFC and mPFC signals were coupled across groups. LIMITATIONS: Such studies can benefit from larger sample sizes, though our observed effect sizes were in the moderate to large range. CONCLUSIONS:Children and adolescents at risk for psychiatric illness and who evince reliably present negative symptoms show brain responses to socially rewarding stimuli similar to those observed in depression. Studies in at-risk children and adolescents may be important in understanding how early manifestations of depression-like characteristics impact brain function.
Authors: Dara M Cannon; Masanori Ichise; Denise Rollis; Jacqueline M Klaver; Shilpa K Gandhi; Dennis S Charney; Husseini K Manji; Wayne C Drevets Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Debra M Montrose; Diana Dworakowski; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Tim Hahn; Andre F Marquand; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Thomas Dresler; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Tomasz A Jarczok; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Peter M Jakob; Janaina Mourao-Miranda; Michael J Brammer; Andreas J Fallgatter Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-12-06
Authors: H S Mayberg; M Liotti; S K Brannan; S McGinnis; R K Mahurin; P A Jerabek; J A Silva; J L Tekell; C C Martin; J L Lancaster; P T Fox Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sarah E Henderson; Ana I Vallejo; Benjamin A Ely; Guoxin Kang; Amy Krain Roy; Daniel S Pine; Emily R Stern; Vilma Gabbay Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Heather C Whalley; Lynsey Hall; Liana Romaniuk; Alix Macdonald; Stephen M Lawrie; Jessika E Sussmann; Andrew M McIntosh Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Neil Bakshi; Gita Gupta; Patrick Pruitt; Richard White; Simon B Eickhoff Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Huai-Hsuan Tseng; Jonathan P Roiser; Gemma Modinos; Irina Falkenberg; Carly Samson; Philip McGuire; Paul Allen Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Jorien van der Velde; Esther M Opmeer; Edith J Liemburg; Richard Bruggeman; Roeline Nieboer; Lex Wunderink; André Aleman Journal: NPJ Schizophr Date: 2015-09-23