OBJECTIVE: To examine prospectively associations between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and body size measures in children. METHODS: Urinary concentrations of nine phthalate metabolites: monoethyl (MEP); mono-n-butyl (MBP); mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP); monobenzyl (MBzP); mono-isobutyl (MiBP); mono-(2-ethylhexyl) (MEHP); mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) (MEOHP); mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) (MECPP); and mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) and the molar sum of the low molecular-weight phthalate metabolites (low MWP: MEP, MBP and MiBP) and high molecular-weight phthalate metabolites (high MWP: MECPP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MEHP and MBzP) and of four di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) metabolites (ΣDEHP: MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MECPP) and anthropometry, including body mass index and waist circumference were measured among 387 Hispanic and Black, New York City children who were between six and eight years at cohort enrollment (2004-2007). Relationships between baseline metabolite concentrations and body size characteristics obtained one year later were examined using multivariate-adjusted geometric means for each body size characteristic by continuous and categories of phthalate metabolite concentrations. Stratified analyses by body size (age/sex specific) were conducted. RESULTS: No significant associations are reported among all girls or boys. Dose response relationships were seen with monoethyl phthalate and the sum of low molecular-weight phthalates and body mass index and waist circumference among overweight children; for increasing monoethyl phthalate concentration quartiles among girls, adjusted mean body mass indexes were as follows: 21.3, 21.7, 23.8, 23.5 and adjusted mean waist circumference (cm) were as follows: 73.4, 73.5, 79.2, 78.8 (p-trend<0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: In this prospective analysis we identified positive relationships between urinary concentrations of monoethyl phthalate and the sum of low molecular-weight phthalates and body size measures in overweight children. These are metabolites with concentrations above 1 μM.
OBJECTIVE: To examine prospectively associations between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and body size measures in children. METHODS: Urinary concentrations of nine phthalate metabolites: monoethyl (MEP); mono-n-butyl (MBP); mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP); monobenzyl (MBzP); mono-isobutyl (MiBP); mono-(2-ethylhexyl) (MEHP); mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) (MEOHP); mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) (MECPP); and mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) and the molar sum of the low molecular-weight phthalate metabolites (low MWP: MEP, MBP and MiBP) and high molecular-weight phthalate metabolites (high MWP: MECPP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MEHP and MBzP) and of four di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) metabolites (ΣDEHP: MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MECPP) and anthropometry, including body mass index and waist circumference were measured among 387 Hispanic and Black, New York City children who were between six and eight years at cohort enrollment (2004-2007). Relationships between baseline metabolite concentrations and body size characteristics obtained one year later were examined using multivariate-adjusted geometric means for each body size characteristic by continuous and categories of phthalate metabolite concentrations. Stratified analyses by body size (age/sex specific) were conducted. RESULTS: No significant associations are reported among all girls or boys. Dose response relationships were seen with monoethyl phthalate and the sum of low molecular-weight phthalates and body mass index and waist circumference among overweight children; for increasing monoethyl phthalate concentration quartiles among girls, adjusted mean body mass indexes were as follows: 21.3, 21.7, 23.8, 23.5 and adjusted mean waist circumference (cm) were as follows: 73.4, 73.5, 79.2, 78.8 (p-trend<0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: In this prospective analysis we identified positive relationships between urinary concentrations of monoethyl phthalate and the sum of low molecular-weight phthalates and body size measures in overweight children. These are metabolites with concentrations above 1 μM.
Authors: L G Parks; J S Ostby; C R Lambright; B D Abbott; G R Klinefelter; N J Barlow; L E Gray Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Dana B Barr; Susan L Teitelbaum; Jodi Siskind; Stefanie J Meisel; James G Wetmur; Mary S Wolff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Giuliana G K Botelho; Munisa Golin; Aedra C Bufalo; Rosana N Morais; Paulo R Dalsenter; Anderson J Martino-Andrade Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Elizabeth E Hatch; Jessica W Nelson; M Mustafa Qureshi; Janice Weinberg; Lynn L Moore; Martha Singer; Thomas F Webster Journal: Environ Health Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Mary S Wolff; Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Chenbo Zhu; James Wetmur; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Richard W Stahlhut; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Timothy D Dye; Stephen Cook; Shanna H Swan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ryan C Lewis; John D Meeker; Karen E Peterson; Joyce M Lee; Gerry G Pace; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2013-09-14 Impact factor: 7.086