Literature DB >> 18076491

Assessment of inhalation exposures and potential health risks to the general population that resulted from the collapse of the World Trade Center towers.

Matthew Lorber1, Herman Gibb, Lester Grant, Joseph Pinto, Joachim Pleil, David Cleverly.   

Abstract

In the days following the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers on September 11, 2001 (9/11), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated numerous air monitoring activities to better understand the ongoing impact of emissions from that disaster. Using these data, EPA conducted an inhalation exposure and human health risk assessment to the general population. This assessment does not address exposures and potential impacts that could have occurred to rescue workers, firefighters, and other site workers, nor does it address exposures that could have occurred in the indoor environment. Contaminants evaluated include particulate matter (PM), metals, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, asbestos, volatile organic compounds, particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, silica, and synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs). This evaluation yielded three principal findings. (1) Persons exposed to extremely high levels of ambient PM and its components, SVFs, and other contaminants during the collapse of the WTC towers, and for several hours afterward, were likely to be at risk for acute and potentially chronic respiratory effects. (2) Available data suggest that contaminant concentrations within and near ground zero (GZ) remained significantly elevated above background levels for a few days after 9/11. Because only limited data on these critical few days were available, exposures and potential health impacts could not be evaluated with certainty for this time period. (3) Except for inhalation exposures that may have occurred on 9/11 and a few days afterward, the ambient air concentration data suggest that persons in the general population were unlikely to suffer short-term or long-term adverse health effects caused by inhalation exposures. While this analysis by EPA evaluated the potential for health impacts based on measured air concentrations, epidemiological studies conducted by organizations other than EPA have attempted to identify actual impacts. Such studies have identified respiratory effects in worker and general populations, and developmental effects in newborns whose mothers were near GZ on 9/11 or shortly thereafter. While researchers are not able to identify specific times and even exactly which contaminants are the cause of these effects, they have nonetheless concluded that exposure to WTC contaminants (and/or maternal stress, in the case of developmental effects) resulted in these effects, and have identified the time period including 9/11 itself and the days and few weeks afterward as a period of most concern based on high concentrations of key pollutants in the air and dust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18076491     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00956.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  18 in total

1.  Chronic and acute exposures to the world trade center disaster and lower respiratory symptoms: area residents and workers.

Authors:  Carey B Maslow; Stephen M Friedman; Parul S Pillai; Joan Reibman; Kenneth I Berger; Roberta Goldring; Steven D Stellman; Mark Farfel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Health effects of World Trade Center (WTC) Dust: An unprecedented disaster's inadequate risk management.

Authors:  Morton Lippmann; Mitchell D Cohen; Lung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  The role of epidemiology in disaster response policy development.

Authors:  Lorna E Thorpe; Shervin Assari; Stephen Deppen; Sherry Glied; Nicole Lurie; Matthew P Mauer; Vickie M Mays; Edward Trapido
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Reproductive Outcomes Following Maternal Exposure to the Events of September 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center, in New York City.

Authors:  Carey B Maslow; Kimberly Caramanica; Jiehui Li; Steven D Stellman; Robert M Brackbill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Post-9/11 cancer incidence in World Trade Center-exposed New York City firefighters as compared to a pooled cohort of firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (9/11/2001-2009).

Authors:  William Moir; Rachel Zeig-Owens; Robert D Daniels; Charles B Hall; Mayris P Webber; Nadia Jaber; James H Yiin; Theresa Schwartz; Xiaoxue Liu; Madeline Vossbrinck; Kerry Kelly; David J Prezant
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 6.  Asbestosis and environmental causes of usual interstitial pneumonia.

Authors:  Mridu Gulati; Carrie A Redlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.155

7.  Exposure science for terrorist attacks and theaters of military conflict: minimizing contact with toxicants.

Authors:  Paul J Lioy
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Associations between phthalate metabolite urinary concentrations and body size measures in New York City children.

Authors:  Susan L Teitelbaum; Nancy Mervish; Erin L Moshier; Nita Vangeepuram; Maida P Galvez; Antonia M Calafat; Manori J Silva; Barbara L Brenner; Mary S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Acute high-level exposure to WTC particles alters expression of genes associated with oxidative stress and immune function in the lung.

Authors:  Mitchell D Cohen; Joshua M Vaughan; Brittany Garrett; Colette Prophete; Lori Horton; Maureen Sisco; Urmila P Kodavanti; William O Ward; Richard E Peltier; Judith Zelikoff; Lung-chi Chen
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Occupational determinants of cumulative lead exposure: analysis of bone lead among men in the VA normative aging study.

Authors:  John S Ji; Joel Schwartz; David Sparrow; Howard Hu; Marc G Weisskopf
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.