Literature DB >> 2221826

Standard maps of chromosome 10.

N E Morton1, A Collins.   

Abstract

To achieve consensus more exact definitions of genetical maps are required, of which standard, comprehensive and skeletal might be some. A standard genetic map gives distance from pter in centimorgans (cM), uses the international nomenclature for assigned loci, is sex-specific, and allows as well as possible for interference and typing errors. A standard physical map gives distance from pter in megabases (Mb). A standard map is called comprehensive if it aims to include all syntenic loci, and skeletal if it is limited to loci whose order is well supported. Loci with established order are called skeletal, and are used to define regional assignments of other loci. These principles are illustrated using the CEPH data for chromosome 10. Map lengths by multiple 2-point analysis under supported interference are in good agreement with other evidence, but multipoint mapping gives a substantial overestimate. There are currently 21 loci in the skeletal genetic map and 40 loci in the comprehensive genetic map. From these data, cytogenetic assignments, and partial genetic maps the physical location has been estimated for 85 loci. MEN2A is in a region close to the centromere in which male recombination per megabase is much reduced. Order of DNA markers in this densely mapped region has not been determined, and therefore the exact location of MEN2A is uncertain, although it is likely to lie between D10S34 and D10S30 and close to D10S11.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2221826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1990.tb00381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  17 in total

1.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?

Authors:  Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  A family with X-linked deafness showing linkage to the proximal Xq region of the X chromosome.

Authors:  D Robinson; M Lamont; G Curtis; D C Shields; P Phelps
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Integration of gene maps: chromosome 1.

Authors:  A Collins; B J Keats; N Dracopoli; D C Shields; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Construction of a map of chromosome 16 by using radiation hybrids.

Authors:  I Ceccherini; G Romeo; S Lawrence; M H Breuning; P C Harris; H Himmelbauer; A M Frischauf; G R Sutherland; G G Germino; S T Reeders
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution linkage analysis outcomes.

Authors:  K H Buetow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Error filtration, interference, and the human linkage map.

Authors:  D C Shields; A Collins; K H Buetow; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Status of the search for a major genetic locus for affective disorder in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  A J Pakstis; J R Kidd; C M Castiglione; K K Kidd
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Parameters of the human genome.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Radiation hybrid mapping.

Authors:  S Lawrence; N E Morton; D R Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.