Literature DB >> 12687641

Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?

Suzanne M Leal1.   

Abstract

Genetic maps play an important role in gene mapping. Inaccurate genetic maps can hinder gene mapping by biasing lod scores and reducing the power to map a trait to a particular region. Although sequence-based physical maps can provide a unique order for markers, they do not provide information on genetic map distances. By simulation studies, I investigated how many meioses are necessary to accurately estimate genetic map distances for maps constructed from microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for various intermarker distances and marker heterozygosity. To evaluate the accuracy of the generated genetic maps, the length of the 95% confidence interval for intermarker genetic distances was examined. In addition, the power to separate two adjacent markers by a nonzero map distance was investigated. The number of meioses necessary to accurately estimate map distances depends greatly not only on intermarker distances but also on marker heterozygosity. For example, for a genetic map with intermarker distances of 0.5 cM generated with 1,000 meioses, when marker heterozygosity was high (0.90), for 96% of the markers there was a nonzero map distance between adjacent markers. However, when marker heterozygosity was low (0.32), only 48% of the markers mapped to a unique position. For identical numbers of meioses and intermarker distances, genetic maps constructed from microsatellite markers will be more precise than maps assembled from SNP markers, due to the higher levels of heterozygosity for microsatellite markers. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687641      PMCID: PMC6141025          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  63 in total

1.  Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; L Kauppi; R Neumann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Map error reduction: using genetic and sequence-based physical maps to order closely linked markers.

Authors:  Andrew T DeWan; Antonio R Parrado; Tara C Matise; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  On the relative importance of marker heterozygosity and intermarker distance in gene mapping.

Authors:  J D Terwilliger; Y Ding; J Ott
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Guidelines for human linkage maps: an international system for human linkage maps (ISLM, 1990).

Authors:  B J Keats; S L Sherman; N E Morton; E B Robson; K H Buetow; P E Cartwright; A Chakravarti; U Francke; P P Green; J Ott
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 5.  Meiotic recombination hotspots.

Authors:  M Lichten; A S Goldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Regions of sex-specific hypo- and hyper-recombination identified through integration of 180 genetic markers into the metric physical map of human chromosome 19.

Authors:  H W Mohrenweiser; S Tsujimoto; L Gordon; A S Olsen
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  A PCR-based genetic linkage map of human chromosome 16.

Authors:  Y Shen; H M Kozman; A Thompson; H A Phillips; K Holman; J Nancarrow; S Lane; L Z Chen; S Apostolou; N A Doggett
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; C Julier; J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Botstein; R L White; M Skolnick; R W Davis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Human DNA polymorphisms and methods of analysis.

Authors:  J L Weber
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.740

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterizing uncertainty in high-density maps from multiparental populations.

Authors:  Daniel Ahfock; Ian Wood; Stuart Stephen; Colin R Cavanagh; B Emma Huang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Optimizing the evidence for linkage by permuting marker order.

Authors:  Gyungah Jun; Yeunjoo Song; Sudha K Iyengar; Robert C Elston
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Genome-wide linkage analysis for alcohol dependence: a comparison between single-nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite marker assays.

Authors:  Qianli Ma; Yi Yu; Yan Meng; John Farrell; Lindsay A Farrer; Marsha A Wilcox
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.