Literature DB >> 30031635

Use of Time and Energy on Exercise, Prolonged TV Viewing, and Work Days.

Charles E Matthews1, Sarah Kozey Keadle2, Pedro F Saint-Maurice3, Steven C Moore3, Erik A Willis3, Joshua N Sampson4, David Berrigan5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to describe differences in time use and energy expenditure associated with exercise, prolonged TV viewing, and work days in a longitudinal study of older adults.
METHODS: Participants were 1,020 adults who completed previous-day recalls that provided a profile of the use of time in sedentary and physical activity. Time use and physical activity energy expenditure were predicted for each type of day (exercise, prolonged TV, work) using linear mixed models, adjusting for age, sex, season of the year, and day of the week. Data were collected in 2012-2013; analysis was completed in 2017.
RESULTS: Exercise days had less sedentary time (-0.37 hours/day) and light activity (-0.29 hours/day), and less household, work, and shopping activities, such that the increase in total physical activity energy expenditure on exercise days (2.83 MET-hours/day) was only about half that expended during exercise (5.98 MET-hours/day). Prolonged TV viewing days had more total sedentary time (0.86 hours/days) and less light (-0.45 hours/day) and moderate-vigorous intensity activity (-0.41 hours/day), and thus lower total physical activity energy expenditure (-2.43 MET-hours/day). Work days had less sleep (-0.91 hours/day) and more total sedentary time (1.32 hours/day).
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise days had more physical activity energy expenditure, but because of reductions in other activities, only about half of the energy expended during exercise was added to total daily physical activity energy expenditure. Prolonged TV viewing days had less physical activity energy expenditure and less moderate-vigorous activity. These findings provide new insights into possible compensation associated with exercise, and suggest a strong link between TV viewing and physical inactivity. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30031635      PMCID: PMC6751560          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  38 in total

1.  Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers: differences between occupations and business sectors.

Authors:  Marielle P Jans; Karin I Proper; Vincent H Hildebrandt
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  American time use survey: sleep time and its relationship to waking activities.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Kenneth M Fomberstein; Farid M Razavi; Siobhan Banks; Jeffrey H William; Roger R Rosa; David F Dinges
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Ecological Momentary Assessments and the Science of Behavior Change.

Authors: 
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 4.  Ecological Momentary Assessment in Physical Activity Research.

Authors:  Genevieve Fridlund Dunton
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Office workers' objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours.

Authors:  Stacy A Clemes; Sophie E O'Connell; Charlotte L Edwardson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 6.  Targeting Reductions in Sitting Time to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health.

Authors:  Sarah K Keadle; David E Conroy; Matthew P Buman; David W Dunstan; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Effect of Exercise Training on Non-Exercise Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Michael V Fedewa; Elizabeth D Hathaway; Tyler D Williams; Michael D Schmidt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time: Effect on Activity Outcomes.

Authors:  Genevieve N Healy; Elizabeth G Eakin; Neville Owen; Anthony D Lamontagne; Marj Moodie; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Glen Wiesner; Lisa Willenberg; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Time regained: when people stop a physical activity program, how does their time use change? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sjaan Gomersall; Carol Maher; Coralie English; Alex Rowlands; Tim Olds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Physical Activity and Total Daily Energy Expenditure in Older US Adults: Constrained versus Additive Models.

Authors:  Erik A Willis; Seth A Creasy; Pedro F Saint-Maurice; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Hermann Pontzer; Dale Schoeller; Richard P Troiano; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Older Women Undergoing Exercise Training.

Authors:  Xuewen Wang; Charity B Breneman; Joshua R Sparks; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-12

3.  Changes in physical activity and sedentary time in United States adults in response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Pedro Saint-Maurice; Janet E Fulton; Shreya Patel; Erikka Loftfield; Joshua N Sampson; Sarah K Keadle; David Berrigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Exploring activity compensation amongst youth and adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany A Swelam; Simone J J M Verswijveren; Jo Salmon; Lauren Arundell; Nicola D Ridgers
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 6.457

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.