OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the independent and joint associations of sitting time and physical activity with risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). BACKGROUND: Sedentary behavior is recognized as a distinct construct beyond lack of leisure-time physical activity, but limited data exist on the interrelationship between these 2 components of energy balance. METHODS: Participants in the prospective Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (n = 71,018), 50 to 79 years of age and free of CVD at baseline (1993 to 1998), provided information on sedentary behavior, defined as hours of sitting/day, and usual physical activity at baseline and during follow-up through September 2010. First CVD (coronary heart disease or stroke) events were centrally adjudicated. RESULTS: Sitting ≥10 h/day compared with ≤5 h/day was associated with increased CVD risk (hazard ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.29) in multivariable models including physical activity. Low physical activity was also associated with higher CVD risk (p for trend < 0.001). When women were cross-classified by sitting time and physical activity (p for interaction = 0.94), CVD risk was highest in inactive women (≤1.7 metabolic equivalent task-h/week) who also reported ≥10 h/day of sitting. Results were similar for coronary heart disease and stroke when examined separately. Associations between prolonged sitting and risk of CVD were stronger in overweight versus normal weight women and women 70 years of age and older compared with younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged sitting time was associated with increased CVD risk, independent of leisure-time physical activity, in postmenopausal women without a history of CVD. A combination of low physical activity and prolonged sitting augments CVD risk.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the independent and joint associations of sitting time and physical activity with risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). BACKGROUND: Sedentary behavior is recognized as a distinct construct beyond lack of leisure-time physical activity, but limited data exist on the interrelationship between these 2 components of energy balance. METHODS:Participants in the prospective Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (n = 71,018), 50 to 79 years of age and free of CVD at baseline (1993 to 1998), provided information on sedentary behavior, defined as hours of sitting/day, and usual physical activity at baseline and during follow-up through September 2010. First CVD (coronary heart disease or stroke) events were centrally adjudicated. RESULTS: Sitting ≥10 h/day compared with ≤5 h/day was associated with increased CVD risk (hazard ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.29) in multivariable models including physical activity. Low physical activity was also associated with higher CVD risk (p for trend < 0.001). When women were cross-classified by sitting time and physical activity (p for interaction = 0.94), CVD risk was highest in inactive women (≤1.7 metabolic equivalent task-h/week) who also reported ≥10 h/day of sitting. Results were similar for coronary heart disease and stroke when examined separately. Associations between prolonged sitting and risk of CVD were stronger in overweight versus normal weight women and women 70 years of age and older compared with younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged sitting time was associated with increased CVD risk, independent of leisure-time physical activity, in postmenopausal women without a history of CVD. A combination of low physical activity and prolonged sitting augments CVD risk.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; M C Whitt; M L Irwin; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; D R Bassett; K H Schmitz; P O Emplaincourt; D R Jacobs; A S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Robert D Langer; Emily White; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Susan L Hendrix; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Philip Greenland; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles P Mouton; Albert Oberman; Michael G Perri; David S Sheps; Mary B Pettinger; David S Siscovick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David W Dunstan; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Robyn Larsen; Genevieve N Healy; Ester Cerin; Marc T Hamilton; Jonathan E Shaw; David A Bertovic; Paul Z Zimmet; Jo Salmon; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Robert V Same; David I Feldman; Nishant Shah; Seth S Martin; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Michael J Blaha; Garth Graham; Haitham M Ahmed Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Robert M Restaino; Lauren K Walsh; Takuma Morishima; Jennifer R Vranish; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; Paul J Fadel; Jaume Padilla Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Sara A Hoffman; Elyse R Daly; Manuel Murillo; Gleb Iakovlev; Bonnie Spring Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ange Wang; FeiFei Qin; Haley Hedlin; Manisha Desai; Rowan Chlebowski; Scarlett Gomez; Charles B Eaton; Karen C Johnson; Lihong Qi; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Catherine Womack; Heather A Wakelee; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Josiemer Mattei; Frank B Hu; Andrea K Chomistek; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; A Heather Eliassen; Stephanie E Chiuve Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-02
Authors: Ronald J Headid; Elizabeth J Pekas; TeSean K Wooden; Won-Mok Son; Gwenael Layec; John Shin; Song-Young Park Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Rebecca Seguin; David M Buchner; Jingmin Liu; Matthew Allison; Todd Manini; Ching-Yun Wang; Joann E Manson; Catherine R Messina; Mahesh J Patel; Larry Moreland; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z Lacroix Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043