Literature DB >> 12601192

Cervical degenerative disease at flexion-extension MR imaging: prediction criteria.

Chi-Jen Chen1, Hui-Ling Hsu, Chi-Chien Niu, Tzu-Yung Chen, Min-Chi Chen, Ying-Chi Tseng, Yon-Cheong Wong, Li-Jen Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if there are any neutral-position imaging criteria that can help predict functional cord impingement at flexion-extension cervical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with cervical degenerative disease were evaluated with regard to the dynamic changes of canal stenosis at flexion-extension MR imaging. Functional cord impingement was considered if the cord was impinged or more impinged after neck flexion or extension. Selection criteria for neutral-position MR imaging, such as cervical curvature, canal space, degenerative stage, intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and resting instability, were evaluated for their ability to predict functional cord impingement at flexion-extension MR imaging (Fisher exact test, logistic regression analysis).
RESULTS: MR images in 19 (31%) of 62 patients showed functional cord impingement at extension MR imaging compared with images in two (3%) patients at flexion MR imaging. Statistically significant differences were found for the criteria cervical degeneration stage (P <.001) and spinal canal space (P =.037) for predicting functional cord impingement at extension MR imaging. In contrast, no significant differences were found among selection criteria for flexion MR imaging. Probabilities of functional cord impingement at extension MR imaging were calculated with different combinations of degenerative stages and canal spaces. Probability could increase to 79% if the patient had both stabilization degeneration (disk protrusion or osteophytic formation with hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum) and C7 canal space of 10 mm or less.
CONCLUSION: None of the selection criteria evaluated in this study has the ability to predict functional cord impingement at flexion MR imaging; however, prediction of impingement at extension MR imaging can increase from 31% to 79% if proper criteria are selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601192     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2271020116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Extension MRI is clinically useful in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; A S Rigby; J Joseph; A Raman; A Kunnacherry; C A Rowland Hill
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population.

Authors:  Shenglin Wang; Chao Wang; Peter G Passias; Gang Li; Ming Yan; Haitao Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do Modic changes affect cervical sagittal alignment and motion in symptomatic patients?

Authors:  Tong Tong; Xian-Da Gao; Jia Li; Jing-Tao Zhang; Rui-Jie Niu; Zhao Liu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Measurement of volume-occupying rate of cervical spinal canal and its role in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Fulong Dong; Cailiang Shen; Shu Jiang; Renjie Zhang; Peiwen Song; Yongqiang Yu; Shiyu Wang; Xiaohu Li; Gang Zhao; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Relationship between Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire and cervical spine MR imaging findings.

Authors:  Estanislao Arana; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Ruben Montijano; Daniel Bautista; Enrique Molla; Salvador Costa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Spinal cord cross-sectional area during flexion and extension in the patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Keigo Ito; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Masaaki Machino; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A novel skull clamp positioning system and technique for posterior cervical surgery: clinical impact on cervical sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Nodoka Manabe; Takachika Shimizu; Tetsu Tanouchi; Keisuke Fueki; Masatake Ino; Naofumi Toda; Kanako Itoh; Kenji Shirakura
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The Assessment of Dynamic Spinal Cord Impingement by Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome.

Authors:  Jia Li; Da Shi; Zijian Hua; Linfeng Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Changes in Severity of Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Flexion and Extension.

Authors:  Yookyung Lee; Seung Yeun Kim; Keewon Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.