Literature DB >> 22213770

Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression.

Paul E Holtzheimer1, Mary E Kelley, Robert E Gross, Megan M Filkowski, Steven J Garlow, Andrea Barrocas, Dylan Wint, Margaret C Craighead, Julie Kozarsky, Ronald Chismar, Jared L Moreines, Klaus Mewes, Patricio Riva Posse, David A Gutman, Helen S Mayberg.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be an effective intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but available data are limited.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of subcallosal cingulate DBS in patients with TRD with either major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar II disorder (BP).
DESIGN: Open-label trial with a sham lead-in phase.
SETTING: Academic medical center. Patients  Men and women aged 18 to 70 years with a moderate-to-severe major depressive episode after at least 4 adequate antidepressant treatments. Ten patients with MDD and 7 with BP were enrolled from a total of 323 patients screened. Intervention  Deep brain stimulation electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the subcallosal cingulate white matter. Patients received single-blind sham stimulation for 4 weeks followed by active stimulation for 24 weeks. Patients then entered a single-blind discontinuation phase; this phase was stopped after the first 3 patients because of ethical concerns. Patients were evaluated for up to 2 years after the onset of active stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in depression severity and functioning over time, and response and remission rates after 24 weeks were the primary efficacy end points; secondary efficacy end points were 1 year and 2 years of active stimulation.
RESULTS: A significant decrease in depression and increase in function were associated with chronic stimulation. Remission and response were seen in 3 patients (18%) and 7 (41%) after 24 weeks (n = 17), 5 (36%) and 5 (36%) after 1 year (n = 14), and 7 (58%) and 11 (92%) after 2 years (n = 12) of active stimulation. No patient achieving remission experienced a spontaneous relapse. Efficacy was similar for patients with MDD and those with BP. Chronic DBS was safe and well tolerated, and no hypomanic or manic episodes occurred. A modest sham stimulation effect was found, likely due to a decrease in depression after the surgical intervention but prior to entering the sham phase.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the long-term safety and antidepressant efficacy of subcallosal cingulate DBS for TRD and suggest equivalent safety and efficacy for TRD in patients with BP. Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00367003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22213770      PMCID: PMC4423545          DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  21 in total

1.  Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment.

Authors:  Paul E Holtzheimer; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: follow-up after 3 to 6 years.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Peter Giacobbe; Sakina J Rizvi; Franca M Placenza; Yasunori Nishikawa; Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery.

Authors:  T W Robbins; M James; A M Owen; B J Sahakian; A D Lawrence; L McInnes; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Mark S George; A John Rush; Lauren B Marangell; Harold A Sackeim; Stephen K Brannan; Sonia M Davis; Robert Howland; Mitchel A Kling; Francisco Moreno; Barry Rittberg; David Dunner; Thomas Schwartz; Linda Carpenter; Michael Burke; Philip Ninan; Paul Goodnick
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Brain penetration effects of microelectrodes and deep brain stimulation leads in ventral intermediate nucleus stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Kelly D Foote; Samuel S Wu; Charles E Jacobson; Ramon L Rodriguez; Ihtsham U Haq; Mustafa S Siddiqui; Irene A Malaty; Christopher J Hass; Michael S Okun
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Eligibility creep: a cause for placebo group improvement in controlled trials of psoriasis treatments.

Authors:  Jeff Hick; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Donald A Malone; Darin D Dougherty; Ali R Rezai; Linda L Carpenter; Gerhard M Friehs; Emad N Eskandar; Scott L Rauch; Steven A Rasmussen; Andre G Machado; Cynthia S Kubu; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; Paul H Stypulkowski; Jonathon E Giftakis; Mark T Rise; Paul F Malloy; Stephen P Salloway; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus for depression: anatomical location of active contacts in clinical responders and a suggested guideline for targeting.

Authors:  Clement Hamani; Helen Mayberg; Brian Snyder; Peter Giacobbe; Sidney Kennedy; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  A tractography analysis of two deep brain stimulation white matter targets for depression.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Paul E Holtzheimer; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  162 in total

1.  Frontal theta cordance predicts 6-month antidepressant response to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Paul E Holtzheimer; Matthew R Hilimire; Nathan A Parks; Jordan E Devylder; Helen S Mayberg; Paul M Corballis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Preclinical studies modeling deep brain stimulation for depression.

Authors:  Clement Hamani; José N Nobrega
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Considering Eligibility for Studies of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Insights From a Clinical Trial in Unipolar and Bipolar Depression.

Authors:  Megan M Filkowski; Helen S Mayberg; Paul E Holtzheimer
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 4.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Electrical Stimulation Normalizes c-Fos Expression in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei of Depressive-like Rats: Implication of Antidepressant Activity.

Authors:  Gemma Huguet; Elisabet Kadar; Yasin Temel; Lee Wei Lim
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  A Review of Brain Stimulation Treatments for Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumberger; Jonathan H Hsu; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-28

7.  Deep brain stimulation reverses anhedonic-like behavior in a chronic model of depression: role of serotonin and brain derived neurotrophic factor.

Authors:  Clement Hamani; Danilo C Machado; Débora C Hipólide; Francisco P Dubiela; Deborah Suchecki; Carlos E Macedo; Fabio Tescarollo; Uilton Martins; Luciene Covolan; José N Nobrega
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Systems approaches to optimizing deep brain stimulation therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sabato Santaniello; John T Gale; Sridevi V Sarma
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 9.  Emotional and behavioral symptoms in neurodegenerative disease: a model for studying the neural bases of psychopathology.

Authors:  Robert W Levenson; Virginia E Sturm; Claudia M Haase
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 18.561

10.  Effects of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation on negative self-bias in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Matthew R Hilimire; Helen S Mayberg; Paul E Holtzheimer; James M Broadway; Nathan A Parks; Jordan E DeVylder; Paul M Corballis
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.