BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Brachypodium distachyon is being widely investigated across the world as a model plant for temperate cereals. This annual plant has three cytotypes (2n = 10, 20, 30) that are still regarded as part of a single species. Here, a multidisciplinary study has been conducted on a representative sampling of the three cytotypes to investigate their evolutionary relationships and origins, and to elucidate if they represent separate species. METHODS: Statistical analyses of 15 selected phenotypic traits were conducted in individuals from 36 lines or populations. Cytogenetic analyses were performed through flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with genomic (GISH) and multiple DNA sequences as probes, and comparative chromosome painting (CCP). Phylogenetic analyses were based on two plastid (ndhF, trnLF) and five nuclear (ITS, ETS, CAL, DGAT, GI) genes from different Brachypodium lineages, whose divergence times and evolutionary rates were estimated. KEY RESULTS: The phenotypic analyses detected significant differences between the three cytotypes and demonstrated stability of characters in natural populations. Genome size estimations, GISH, FISH and CCP confirmed that the 2n = 10 and 2n = 20 cytotypes represent two different diploid taxa, whereas the 2n = 30 cytotype represents the allotetraploid derived from them. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the 2n = 20 and 2n = 10 cytotypes emerged from two independent lineages that were, respectively, the maternal and paternal genome donors of the 2n = 30 cytotype. The 2n = 20 lineage was older and mutated significantly faster than the 2n = 10 lineage and all the core perennial Brachypodium species. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular differences detected among the three B. distachyon sensu lato cytotypes are indicative of major speciation processes within this complex that allow their taxonomic separation into three distinct species. We have kept the name B. distachyon for the 2n = 10 cytotype and have described two novel species as B. stacei and B. hybridum for, respectively, the 2n = 20 and 2n = 30 cytotypes.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Brachypodium distachyon is being widely investigated across the world as a model plant for temperate cereals. This annual plant has three cytotypes (2n = 10, 20, 30) that are still regarded as part of a single species. Here, a multidisciplinary study has been conducted on a representative sampling of the three cytotypes to investigate their evolutionary relationships and origins, and to elucidate if they represent separate species. METHODS: Statistical analyses of 15 selected phenotypic traits were conducted in individuals from 36 lines or populations. Cytogenetic analyses were performed through flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with genomic (GISH) and multiple DNA sequences as probes, and comparative chromosome painting (CCP). Phylogenetic analyses were based on two plastid (ndhF, trnLF) and five nuclear (ITS, ETS, CAL, DGAT, GI) genes from different Brachypodium lineages, whose divergence times and evolutionary rates were estimated. KEY RESULTS: The phenotypic analyses detected significant differences between the three cytotypes and demonstrated stability of characters in natural populations. Genome size estimations, GISH, FISH and CCP confirmed that the 2n = 10 and 2n = 20 cytotypes represent two different diploid taxa, whereas the 2n = 30 cytotype represents the allotetraploid derived from them. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the 2n = 20 and 2n = 10 cytotypes emerged from two independent lineages that were, respectively, the maternal and paternal genome donors of the 2n = 30 cytotype. The 2n = 20 lineage was older and mutated significantly faster than the 2n = 10 lineage and all the core perennial Brachypodium species. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular differences detected among the three B. distachyon sensu lato cytotypes are indicative of major speciation processes within this complex that allow their taxonomic separation into three distinct species. We have kept the name B. distachyon for the 2n = 10 cytotype and have described two novel species as B. stacei and B. hybridum for, respectively, the 2n = 20 and 2n = 30 cytotypes.
Authors: Luis A J Mur; Joel Allainguillaume; Pilar Catalán; Robert Hasterok; Glyn Jenkins; Karolina Lesniewska; Ianto Thomas; John Vogel Journal: New Phytol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Robert Hasterok; Agnieszka Marasek; Iain S Donnison; Ian Armstead; Ann Thomas; Ian P King; Elzbieta Wolny; Dominika Idziak; John Draper; Glyn Jenkins Journal: Genetics Date: 2006-02-19 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Jeffery M Saarela; Sean V Burke; William P Wysocki; Matthew D Barrett; Lynn G Clark; Joseph M Craine; Paul M Peterson; Robert J Soreng; Maria S Vorontsova; Melvin R Duvall Journal: PeerJ Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Antonio J Manzaneda; Pedro J Rey; Jill T Anderson; Evan Raskin; Christopher Weiss-Lehman; Thomas Mitchell-Olds Journal: Evolution Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Timothy L Fitzgerald; Jonathan J Powell; Katharina Schneebeli; M Mandy Hsia; Donald M Gardiner; Jennifer N Bragg; C Lynne McIntyre; John M Manners; Mick Ayliffe; Michelle Watt; John P Vogel; Robert J Henry; Kemal Kazan Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Jeffery M Saarela; Roger D Bull; Michel J Paradis; Sharon N Ebata; Robert J Soreng; Beata Paszko Journal: PhytoKeys Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 1.635
Authors: Luisa M Martínez; Ana Fernández-Ocaña; Pedro J Rey; Teresa Salido; Francisco Amil-Ruiz; Antonio J Manzaneda Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Matthias Pfeifer; Mihaela Martis; Torben Asp; Klaus F X Mayer; Thomas Lübberstedt; Stephen Byrne; Ursula Frei; Bruno Studer Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 8.340