Literature DB >> 22208484

Validation of KRAS testing for anti-EGFR therapeutic decisions for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Suzanne Kamel-Reid1, Tong Zhang, Diane L Persons, Marina N Nikiforova, Kevin C Halling.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: KRAS mutation status is a molecular marker for predicting patient response to treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Different approaches may be taken to detect KRAS mutations. There currently are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved assays for the detection of KRAS mutations. For assays that are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the performance characteristics of the assay must be determined and validated by the clinical laboratory before implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an example of how a KRAS mutation-analysis assay may be validated in a clinical laboratory.
DESIGN: Describing the approach used by an individual laboratory to compare different assays for validation of KRAS mutation analysis in metastatic colon carcinoma.
RESULTS: Specific validation data are provided, illustrating how a laboratory established assay performance characteristics for KRAS mutation analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: All clinical laboratories must establish several performance specifications mandated by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 before implementation of any laboratory-developed test. Approaches to the validation of such assays may vary among laboratories. We describe an approach used for validation of a KRAS mutation-analysis assay by one laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22208484     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0220-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  11 in total

Review 1.  Preparing pathology for precision medicine: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Karen L Kaul
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Low percentage of KRAS mutations revealed by locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction: implications for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mariella Dono; Carlotta Massucco; Silvana Chiara; Claudia Sonaglio; Marco Mora; Anna Truini; Giannamaria Cerruti; Gabriele Zoppoli; Alberto Ballestrero; Mauro Truini; Manlio Ferrarini; Simona Zupo
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.354

3.  Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Neal I Lindeman; Philip T Cagle; Mary Beth Beasley; Dhananjay Arun Chitale; Sanja Dacic; Giuseppe Giaccone; Robert Brian Jenkins; David J Kwiatkowski; Juan-Sebastian Saldivar; Jeremy Squire; Erik Thunnissen; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Neal I Lindeman; Philip T Cagle; Mary Beth Beasley; Dhananjay Arun Chitale; Sanja Dacic; Giuseppe Giaccone; Robert Brian Jenkins; David J Kwiatkowski; Juan-Sebastian Saldivar; Jeremy Squire; Erik Thunnissen; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Automated objective determination of percentage of malignant nuclei for mutation testing.

Authors:  Hollis Viray; Madeline Coulter; Kevin Li; Kristin Lane; Aruna Madan; Kisha Mitchell; Kurt Schalper; Clifford Hoyt; David L Rimm
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2014 May-Jun

6.  Molecular profiling for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Raheela Ashfaq
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspective.

Authors:  Umberto Malapelle; Claudio Bellevicine; Maria Salatiello; Caterina de Luca; Elisabetta Rispo; Palmira Riccio; Lucianna Sparano; Alfonso De Stefano; Chiara Carlomagno; Francesco Maria Maiello; Giulia Vita; Oscar Nappi; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Molecular Testing for Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  Hye Seung Lee; Woo Ho Kim; Yoonjin Kwak; Jiwon Koh; Jeong Mo Bae; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Mee Soo Chang; Hye Seung Han; Joon Mee Kim; Hwal Woong Kim; Hee Kyung Chang; Young Hee Choi; Ji Y Park; Mi Jin Gu; Min Jin Lhee; Jung Yeon Kim; Hee Sung Kim; Mee-Yon Cho
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2017-02-19

9.  The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures: Quality and Positive Impact on Patient Care.

Authors:  Karen L Kaul; Linda M Sabatini; Gregory J Tsongalis; Angela M Caliendo; Randall J Olsen; Edward R Ashwood; Sherri Bale; Robert Benirschke; Dean Carlow; Birgit H Funke; Wayne W Grody; Randall T Hayden; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Kazunori Murata; Melissa Pessin; Richard D Press; Richard B Thomson
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-07-16

10.  Searching for new biomarkers in ovarian cancer patients: Rationale and design of a retrospective study under the Mermaid III project.

Authors:  Julie L Hentze; Claus Høgdall; Susanne K Kjær; Jan Blaakær; Estrid Høgdall
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.