Literature DB >> 22207733

Prognostic value of monosomal karyotype in comparison to complex aberrant karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia: a study on 824 cases with aberrant karyotype.

Claudia Haferlach1, Tamara Alpermann, Susanne Schnittger, Wolfgang Kern, Jörg Chromik, Christoph Schmid, Hermann Josef Pielken, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Heinz-Gert Höffkes, Torsten Haferlach.   

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) the subset with complex karyotype (CK) is traditionally regarded as the worst prognostic group. However, ≥ 3, ≥ 4, or ≥ 5 abnormalities have been variably used for its definition. Recently, monosomal karyotype (MSK) was suggested to indicate an even inferior outcome. We tested which definition fits best to identify the most unfavorable subgroup. After excluding patients with t(15;17)/PML-RARA, t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1, inv (16)/t(16;16)/CBFB-MYH11, and normal karyotype, 824 patients with AML with cytogenetic abnormalities were analyzed. Patients with MSK or CK defined as ≥ 3, ≥ 4, or ≥ 5 abnormalities showed an inferior overall survival compared with the respective remaining patients not fulfilling these criteria (for all, P < .001). Hazard ratios were 1.93, 1.68, 1.94, and 1.92. CK ≥ 4 as a single parameter identified the largest proportion of patients with very poor risk. However, combining CK ≥ 4 and MSK detected an even larger number of patients with very unfavorable outcome (261 of 824; 31.7%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22207733     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-385781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  20 in total

Review 1.  Standardizing the initial evaluation for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Danielle Marshall; Gail J Roboz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Prognostic Significance of Complex Karyotypes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Yahya Daneshbod; Leila Kohan; Vahideh Taghadosi; Olga K Weinberg; Daniel A Arber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

3.  Independent Prognostic Significance of Monosomy 17 and Impact of Karyotype Complexity in Monosomal Karyotype/Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Four ECOG-ACRIN Prospective Therapeutic Trials.

Authors:  Stephen A Strickland; Zhuoxin Sun; Rhett P Ketterling; Athena M Cherry; Larry D Cripe; Gordon Dewald; Hugo F Fernandez; Gary A Hicks; Rodney R Higgins; Hillard M Lazarus; Mark R Litzow; Selina M Luger; Elisabeth M Paietta; Jacob M Rowe; Gail H Vance; Peter Wiernik; Anne E Wiktor; Yanming Zhang; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Five-group cytogenetic risk classification, monosomal karyotype, and outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS or acute leukemia evolving from MDS.

Authors:  H Joachim Deeg; Bart L Scott; Min Fang; Howard M Shulman; Boglarka Gyurkocza; David Myerson; John M Pagel; Uwe Platzbecker; Aravind Ramakrishnan; Jerald P Radich; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed Sorror; Derek L Stirewalt; Wendy A Wilson; Rainer Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum; Ted Gooley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Prognostic implications of chromosome 17 abnormalities in the context of monosomal karyotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Vijaya R Bhatt; Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Lynne Abruzzo; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Keating; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-22

6.  Complex or monosomal karyotype and not blast percentage is associated with poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2): a Bone Marrow Pathology Group study.

Authors:  Heesun J Rogers; James W Vardiman; John Anastasi; Gordana Raca; Natasha M Savage; Athena M Cherry; Daniel Arber; Erika Moore; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Adam Bagg; Yen-Chun Liu; Susan Mathew; Attilio Orazi; Pei Lin; Sa A Wang; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Kathryn Foucar; Robert P Hasserjian; Ramon V Tiu; Matthew Karafa; Eric D Hsi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo C Pasquini; Mei-Jie Zhang; Bruno C Medeiros; Philippe Armand; Zhen-Huan Hu; Taiga Nishihori; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Görgün Akpek; Jean-Yves Cahn; Mitchell S Cairo; Jan Cerny; Edward A Copelan; Abhinav Deol; César O Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Biju George; Vikas Gupta; Gregory A Hale; Rammurti T Kamble; Thomas R Klumpp; Hillard M Lazarus; Selina M Luger; Jane L Liesveld; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Rodrigo Martino; Maxim Norkin; Richard F Olsson; Betul Oran; Attaphol Pawarode; Michael A Pulsipher; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Ran Reshef; Ayman A Saad; Wael Saber; Bipin N Savani; Harry C Schouten; Olle Ringdén; Martin S Tallman; Geoffrey L Uy; William A Wood; Baldeep Wirk; Waleska S Pérez; Minoo Batiwalla; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Hyperdiploidy with 49-65 chromosomes represents a heterogeneous cytogenetic subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with differential outcome.

Authors:  L Chilton; R K Hills; C J Harrison; A K Burnett; D Grimwade; A V Moorman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Acute myeloid leukemia with adverse cytogenetic risk.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 10.  Molecular markers in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Andrea Kühnl; David Grimwade
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.