Literature DB >> 24178514

Standardizing the initial evaluation for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Danielle Marshall1, Gail J Roboz.   

Abstract

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) pose a unique diagnostic challenge for clinicians and pathologists due to the clinicopathologic heterogeneity of the disease and overlapping features with other benign and malignant disorders. Currently, the initial evaluation of a patient with suspected MDS centers around a detailed medical history, review of the peripheral blood and bone marrow by an expert hematopathologist and risk stratification using laboratory results, morphology and cytogenetics. More sophisticated technologies, including multi-color flow cytometry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing, and others are emerging and promise to offer significant refinements in diagnostic, prognostic and, hopefully, therapeutic information. With the incidence and prevalence of MDS increasing worldwide, it is critical for clinicians to optimize the initial evaluation of a patient with suspected disease, using a standard schema, to facilitate accurate diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24178514     DOI: 10.1007/s11899-013-0180-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep        ISSN: 1558-8211            Impact factor:   3.952


  58 in total

1.  Comprehensive array CGH of normal karyotype myelodysplastic syndromes reveals hidden recurrent and individual genomic copy number alterations with prognostic relevance.

Authors:  A Thiel; M Beier; D Ingenhag; K Servan; M Hein; V Moeller; B Betz; B Hildebrandt; C Evers; U Germing; B Royer-Pokora
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) and idiopathic dysplasia of uncertain significance (IDUS), and their distinction from low risk MDS.

Authors:  Peter Valent; Barbara J Bain; John M Bennett; Friedrich Wimazal; Wolfgang R Sperr; Ghulam Mufti; Hans-Peter Horny
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Molecular cytogenetic monitoring from CD34+ peripheral blood cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: first results from a prospective multicenter German diagnostic study.

Authors:  Friederike Braulke; Klaus Jung; Julie Schanz; Katharina Götze; Catharina Müller-Thomas; Uwe Platzbecker; Ulrich Germing; Tim H Brümmendorf; Gesine Bug; Oliver Ottmann; Aristoteles A N Giagounidis; Michael Stadler; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Philippe Schafhausen; Michael Lübbert; Richard F Schlenk; Igor W Blau; Christina Ganster; Sebastian Pfeiffer; Katayoon Shirneshan; Michael Metz; Sven Detken; Jörg Seraphin; Kathleen Jentsch-Ullrich; Angelika Böhme; Burkhard Schmidt; Lorenz Trümper; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 4.  Unraveling the molecular pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Ross Levine; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen Stevenson; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Naomi Galili; Björn Nilsson; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Azra Raza; Ross L Levine; Donna Neuberg; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Voso; Susanna Fenu; Roberto Latagliata; Francesco Buccisano; Alfonso Piciocchi; Maria Antonietta Aloe-Spiriti; Massimo Breccia; Marianna Criscuolo; Alessandro Andriani; Stefano Mancini; Pasquale Niscola; Virginia Naso; Carolina Nobile; Anna Lina Piccioni; Mariella D'Andrea; Ada D'Addosio; Giuseppe Leone; Adriano Venditti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Association of comorbidities with overall survival in myelodysplastic syndrome: development of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Kiran Naqvi; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sagar Sardesai; Jeong Oh; Carlos E Vigil; Sherry Pierce; Xiudong Lei; Jianqin Shan; Hagop M Kantarjian; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Hematopoietic stem cell and progenitor cell mechanisms in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Wendy W Pang; John V Pluvinage; Elizabeth A Price; Kunju Sridhar; Daniel A Arber; Peter L Greenberg; Stanley L Schrier; Christopher Y Park; Irving L Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Monosomal karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia defines a distinct subgroup within the adverse cytogenetic risk category.

Authors:  Georgia Voutiadou; George Papaioannou; Maria Gaitatzi; Chrysavgi Lalayanni; Antonia Syrigou; Chrysanthi Vadikoliou; Riad Saloum; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Anastasia Athanasiadou
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 10.  The myelodysplastic syndrome as a prototypical epigenetic disease.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical and genetic predictors of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 9.941

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.