Literature DB >> 2220724

Healing or amelioration of esophagitis does not result in increased lower esophageal sphincter or esophageal contractile pressure.

M L Allen1, D L McIntosh, M G Robinson.   

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence regarding whether lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal contractile pressures are affected by changes in the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We compared the manometric and endoscopic findings from 30 patients before and after treatment for esophagitis. Before treatment, the grade of esophagitis (I-III) was significantly correlated (r = -0.37; p less than 0.05) with lower esophageal sphincter pressure, but not with esophageal contractile pressure. After treatment, the grade of esophagitis did not change or became worse in 15 patients, and became better in 15 patients. Of these, seven healed. The group that showed no endoscopic improvement demonstrated no change in lower esophageal sphincter or esophageal contractile pressures. The group that did show endoscopic improvement also demonstrated no increase in lower esophageal sphincter or esophageal contractile pressures, and this was particularly evident in those whose esophagitis healed. These data suggest that healing of esophagitis does not result in improvement of esophageal motor function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2220724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Does oesophageal motor function improve with time after successful antireflux surgery? Results of a prospective, randomised clinical study.

Authors:  L Rydberg; M Ruth; L Lundell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophagitis impairs esophageal smooth muscle reactivity in the rat model: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Melih Tugay; Firuzan Yildiz; Tijen Utkan; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Faruk Erden; Nejat Gacar; Güner Ulak
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Ineffective esophageal motility is a primary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Ho; Chi-Sen Chang; Chun-Ying Wu; Gran-Hum Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effects of omeprazole on mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in childhood.

Authors:  S Cucchiara; R Minella; A Campanozzi; G Salvia; O Borrelli; E Ciccimarra; M Emiliano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  U Diener; M G Patti; D Molena; P M Fisichella; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Healing of severe esophagitis improves esophageal peristaltic dysfunction.

Authors:  P Deprez; R Fiasse
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Hiccups and gastroesophageal reflux: cause and effect?

Authors:  M J Fisher; R K Mittal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Macroscopic healing of esophagitis does not improve esophageal motility.

Authors:  J M Howard; R P Reynolds; J V Frei; M A Flowers; T J McDonald; K Tilbe; D C Bondy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Esophageal mucosal damage may promote dysmotility and worsen esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Adam T Meneghetti; Pietro Tedesco; Tanuja Damani; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.