| Literature DB >> 22203880 |
Hong Zhao1, Qingyuan Zhang, Ling Zhao, Xu Huang, Jincai Wang, Xinmei Kang.
Abstract
The fatigue prevalence in breast cancer survivors is high during the endocrine treatment. However, there are few evidence-based interventions to manage this symptom. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum for cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy. Spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum is a kind of Basidiomycete which is a widely used traditional medicine in China. 48 breast cancer patients with cancer-related fatigue undergoing endocrine therapy were randomized into the experimental or control group. FACT-F, HADS, and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires data were collected at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment. The concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and liver-kidney functions were measured before and after intervention. The experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in the domains of physical well-being and fatigue subscale after intervention. These patients also reported less anxiety and depression and better quality of life. Immune markers of CRF were significantly lower and no serious adverse effects occurred during the study. This pilot study suggests that spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum may have beneficial effects on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy without any significant adverse effect.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22203880 PMCID: PMC3236089 DOI: 10.1155/2012/809614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Demographics of patients in each group.
| Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) age (year) | |||
| mean (SD) | 51.3 (9.8) | 53.2 (8.7) |
|
|
| |||
| (2) Body mass index (kg/m2) | |||
| mean (SD) | 22.9 (3.8) | 23.2 (3.5) |
|
|
| |||
| (3) Menopausal status |
| ||
| Pre-menopause | 10 (40.0%) | 12 (52.1%) | |
| Post-menopause | 15 (60.0%) | 11 (47.9%) | |
|
| |||
| (4) Clinical stage |
| ||
| Stage I | 8 (32.0%) | 7 (30.4%) | |
| Stage II | 10 (40.0%) | 9 (39.2%) | |
| Stage IIIA | 7 (28.0%) | 7 (30.4%) | |
|
| |||
| (5) Treatment |
| ||
| Surgery + endocrine therapy | 4 (16.0%) | 3 (13.1%) | |
| Surgery + radiation + endocrine therapy | 4 (16.0%) | 4 (17.3%) | |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + endocrine | |||
| Therapy | 11 (44.0%) | 10 (43.5%) | |
| Surgery + chemotherapy + radiation + endocrine therapy | 6 (24.0%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
|
| |||
| (6) Duration of endocrine therapy |
| ||
| >6 Months to 3 years | 15 (60.0%) | 13 (56.5%) | |
| >3 years to 5 years | 10 (40.0%) | 10 (43.5%) | |
|
| |||
| (7) Physical Activity |
| ||
| MHW < 3.3 | 2 (8.0%) | 1 (4.3%) | |
| 3.3 ≤ MHW < 10.0 | 7 (28.0%) | 10 (43.5%) | |
| 10.0 ≤ MHW < 20.0 | 12 (48.0%) | 9 (39.1%) | |
| MHW ≥ 20.0 | 4 (16.0%) | 3 (13.1%) | |
|
| |||
| (8) Diet |
| ||
| 0 | 3 (12.0%) | 2 (8.6%) | |
| 1~2 | 7 (28.0%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
| 3~4 | 8 (32.0%) | 9 (39. 2%) | |
| 5 | 7 (28.0%) | 6 (26.1%) | |
FACT-F scores for experimental group and control group.
| Subscal (range of scores) | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Physical (0–28) | ||
| Week 0 | 20.35 ± 4.07 | 19.43 ± 4.19 |
| Week 4 | 24.62 ± 3.27∗∗## | 20.65 ± 3.97 |
|
| ||
| Social/family (0–28) | ||
| Week 0 | 21.35 ± 3.91 | 20.89 ± 3.91 |
| Week 4 | 22.37 ± 3.61 | 21.12 ± 4.07 |
|
| ||
| Emotional (0–24) | ||
| Week 0 | 17.61 ± 4.00 | 16.73 ± 3.87 |
| Week 4 | 21.49 ± 2.21∗# | 17.99 ± 2.07 |
|
| ||
| Functional (0–28) | ||
| Week 0 | 17.87 ± 4.93 | 17.35 ± 4.87 |
| Week 4 | 22.87 ± 5.13∗# | 18.29 ± 3.79 |
|
| ||
| Fatigue subscale (0–52) | ||
| Week 0 | 39.76 ± 5.10 | 40.35 ± 6.10 |
| Week 4 | 46.78 ± 5.07∗∗## | 40.92 ± 5.62 |
|
| ||
| Total (0–160) | ||
| Week 0 | 120.31 ± 20.15 | 119.65 ± 18.99 |
| Week 4 | 141.09 ± 17.23∗∗# # | 121.01 ± 19.13 |
*P < 0.05 versus week 0 of experimental group.
**P < 0.01 versus week 0 of experimental group.
# P < 0.05 versus week 4 of control group.
## P < 0.01 versus week 4 of control group.
HAD scores for experimental group and control group.
| Subscale | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety | ||
| Week 0 | 6.3 ± 3.2 | 6.5 ± 3.4 |
| Week 4 | 4.1 ± 2.9∗# | 6.1 ± 3.2 |
|
| ||
| Depression | ||
| Week 0 | 4.9 ± 3.8 | 4.8 ± 3.1 |
| Week 4 | 3.1 ± 2.8∗∗## | 4.6 ± 2.9 |
|
| ||
| Total | ||
| Week 0 | 10.9 ± 4.1 | 10.8 ± 3.9 |
| Week 4 | 7.1 ± 3.1∗∗## | 9.8 ± 3.4 |
*P < 0.05 versus week 0 of experimental group.
**P < 0.01 versus week 0 of experimental group.
# P < 0.05 versus week 4 of control group.
## P < 0.01 versus week 4 of control group.
Patients' functioning and global quality of life scores as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.
| Subscale | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Functional scales | ||
| Physical functioning | ||
| Week 0 | 63.7 ± 25.9 | 64.0 ± 27.1 |
| Week 4 | 78.2 ± 26.1∗∗## | 64.5 ± 28.7 |
|
| ||
| Role functioning | ||
| Week 0 | 65.2 ± 33.6 | 68.1 ± 31.2 |
| Week 4 | 79.1 ± 31.1 | 69.3 ± 32.4 |
|
| ||
| Emotional functioning | ||
| Week 0 | 61.3 ± 30.2 | 62.2 ± 32.5 |
| Week 4 | 79.5 ± 31.5∗∗## | 64.3 ± 31.8 |
|
| ||
| Social Functioning | ||
| Week 0 | 72.4 ± 29.1 | 74.3 ± 28.6 |
| Week 4 | 76.1 ± 26.8 | 75.5 ± 27.9 |
|
| ||
| Cognitive functioning | ||
| Week 0 | 65.6 ± 24.3 | 66.4 ± 23.2 |
| Week 4 | 75.1 ± 26.5∗# | 68.3 ± 26.3 |
|
| ||
| Global Quality of Life | ||
| Week 0 | 55.8 ± 22.9 | 56.6 ± 23.0 |
| Week 4 | 68.9 ± 21.4∗∗## | 57.7 ± 24.2 |
*P < 0.05 versus Week 0 of experimental group.
**P < 0.01 versus Week 0 of experimental group.
# P < 0.05 versus week 4 of control group.
## P < 0.01 versus week 4 of control group.
Patients' symptom scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30.
| Symptom scales | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | ||
| Week 0 | 43.7 ± 17.9 | 42.3 ± 15.7 |
| Week 4 | 31.1 ± 18.1∗∗## | 40.2 ± 16.8 |
|
| ||
| Pain | ||
| Week 0 | 32.4 ± 12.7 | 31.3 ± 13.6 |
| Week 4 | 29.3 ± 14.6 | 30.7 ± 17.3 |
|
| ||
| Sleep disturbance | ||
| Week 0 | 56.5 ± 21.8 | 55.8 ± 22.6 |
| Week 4 | 42.3 ± 26.2∗∗## | 53.9 ± 24.8 |
|
| ||
| Appetite loss | ||
| Week 0 | 32.5 ± 19.3 | 32.3 ± 17.4 |
| Week 4 | 24.3 ± 18.4∗# | 30.3 ± 16.5 |
|
| ||
| Constipation | ||
| Week 0 | 31.1 ± 11.4 | 32.5 ± 12.8 |
| Week 4 | 28.2 ± 13.3 | 30.6 ± 14.7 |
|
| ||
| Diarrhea | ||
| Week 0 | 12.9 ± 10.9 | 12.7 ± 10.5 |
| Week 4 | 11.8 ± 8.8 | 10.6 ± 9.6 |
*P < 0.05 versus week 0 of experimental group.
**P < 0.01 versus week 0 of experimental group.
# P < 0.05 versus week 4 of control group.
## P < 0.01 versus week 4 of control group.
Figure 1The concentrations of TNF-α in experimental group and control group at baseline and 4 week.
Figure 2The concentrations of IL-6 in experimental group and control group at baseline and 4 week.
Mild adverse events of patients in Experimental Group.
| Adverse events | Cases (%) |
|---|---|
| Dizziness | 4 (16.0%) |
| Dry mouth | 3 (12.0%) |
| Diarrhea | 2 (8.6%) |
| Stomach discomfort | 2 (8.6%) |
| Nausea | 2 (8.6%) |
| Epistaxis | 1 (4.0%) |
| Sore throat | 1 (4.0%) |